CHAPTER 23: HUMANISM
1. “Good without God”: From the 19th century, revived by the Harvard Humanist chaplain Greg Epstein (Epstein 2009). Other recent explanations of humanism: Grayling 2013; Law 2011. History of American Humanism: Jacoby 2005. Major Humanist organizations include the American Humanist Association, https://americanhumanist.org/ and the other members of the Secular Coalition of America, https://www.secular.org/member_orgs; the British Humanist Association (https://humanism.org.uk/); the International Humanist and Ethical Union, http://iheu.org/; and the Freedom from Religion Foundation (www.ffrf.org).
2.
3. R. Goldstein, “Speaking Prose All Our Lives,”
4. The rights declarations of 1688, 1776, 1789, and 1948: Hunt 2007.
5. Morality as impartiality: de Lazari-Radek & Singer 2012; Goldstein 2006; Greene 2013; Nagel 1970; Railton 1986; Singer 1981/2010; Smart & Williams 1973. The “impartiality” umbrella was articulated most explicitly by the philosopher Henry Sidgwick (1838–1900).
6. For an exhaustive (if eccentric) list of Golden, Silver, and Platinum rules across cultures and history, see Terry 2008.
7. Evolution explains the existence of mind despite entropy: Tooby, Cosmides, & Barrett 2003. Natural selection is the only explanation of nonrandom design: Dawkins 1983.
8. Curiosity and sociality as concomitants of the evolution of intelligence: Pinker 2010; Tooby & DeVore 1987.
9. Evolutionary conflicts of interest within and among people: Pinker 1997/2009, chaps. 6 and 7; Pinker 2002/2016, chap. 14; Pinker 2011, chaps. 8 and 9. Many of these ideas originated with the biologist Robert Trivers (2002).
10. The Pacifist’s Dilemma and the historical decline of violence: Pinker 2011, chap. 10.
11. DeScioli 2016.
12. Evolution of sympathy: Dawkins 1976/1989; McCullough 2008; Pinker 1997/2009; Trivers 2002; Pinker 2011, chap. 9.
13. Expanding circle of sympathy: Pinker 2011; Singer 1981/2010.
14. For example, T. Nagel, “The Facts Fetish (Review of Sam Harris’s
15. Utilitarianism, for and against: Rachels & Rachels 2010; Smart & Williams 1973.
16. Compatibility of deontological and consequential meta-ethics: Parfit 2011.
17. Track record of utilitarianism: Pinker 2011, chaps. 4 and 6; Greene 2013.
18. From
19. Unintuitiveness of classical liberalism: Fiske & Rai 2015; Haidt 2012; Pinker 2011, chap. 9.
20. Greene 2013.
21. The importance of philosophical thinness: Berlin 1988/2013; Gregg 2003; Hammond 2017.
22. Hammond 2017.
23. Maritain 1949. Original typescript available at the UNESCO Web site, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001550/155042eb.pdf.
24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights: United Nations 1948. History of the Declaration: Glendon 1999, 2001; Hunt 2007.
25. Quoted in Glendon 1999.
26. Human rights not particularly Western: Glendon 1998; Hunt 2007; Sikkink 2017.
27. R. Cohen, “The Death of Liberalism,”
28. S. Kinzer, “The Enlightenment Had a Good Run,”
29. ISIS more appealing than Enlightenment: R. Douthat, “The Islamic Dilemma,”
30. Universality of proscriptions of murder, rape, and violence: Brown 2000.
31. God as enforcer: Atran 2002; Norenzayan 2015.
32. Fatal flaws in arguments for the existence of God: Goldstein 2010; see also Dawkins 2006 and Coyne 2015.
33. Coyne draws in part on arguments from the astronomer Carl Sagan and the philosophers Yonatan Fishman and Maarten Boudry. For a review, see S. Pinker, “The Untenability of Faitheism,”