Читаем This Much Is True полностью

I didn’t have sexual intercourse at Cambridge. Some did; I didn’t. It was partly because my parents told me that I mustn’t, and also, of course, because I didn’t know then that I was gay. (We called it ‘queer’.) But I had the usual hormones of a young woman, so I was tearing around rather frustrated. It was imperative to have a boyfriend — there was a competitive element in it. Other people were pairing off, kissing and rubbing and ‘necking’ as it was called, and I didn’t know what to do with myself. And so I just sucked people off.

My prowess at oral sex was well known in Cambridge. I felt it was one of my best things — certainly the sexual activity I’d had most experience of performing. It didn’t matter to me whose penis was in my mouth, it was all grist to the mill; I knew I was giving pleasure, which was what delighted me. One day, in my second year, I was cycling along the cobbles and I stopped for the traffic lights. I looked to my right; alongside me there was an open-topped car driven by a handsome American soldier. I cannot explain my impulse but I called over to him, ‘Would you like to follow me to my college and I will suck you off?’ The young man blinked but he followed me; I parked my bike, he parked his car, followed me to my room, and I performed as promised. Afterwards, he seemed pleased and said, ‘What do you say I come back next week and bring some friends?’

I related this at breakfast the following morning, and everyone seemed quite taken aback by my boldness, but I thought I was a good girl — a bad girl would have had full intercourse. I hadn’t let him anywhere near my vagina, after all. He was a pleasant chap, from Texas.

My friends’ favourite story of my misdemeanours happened in the Newnham bike shed. One evening, late after rehearsals, I was in the bike shed sucking someone off. And Lesley Cook, my moral tutor, was parking her bike and she saw me. She didn’t see the bloke as he was in the shadows, but she saw me bending down over something and said, ‘Goodnight, Miriam.’

‘Goo’ ’ight, ’iss ’ook,’ came my polite reply, my usual, clear diction muddied as my mouth was full of cock.

I didn’t just suck off random strangers, however. In fact, I now had a boyfriend. The first was a decent guy in his third year called Ted. One of my Old Hall friends had been asked to bring another girl along on a blind date. I joined her and her chap: Ted was with them. The third-year males really were men, as they had done National Service; this had ended in 1960, so our male contemporaries had come straight from school and seemed boys in comparison. Ted was clearly a man, an engineer — truly, I remember little more than that about him. I didn’t love him but our sexual fumbles were fun and it meant I had a boyfriend. The second was David Bree, also studying engineering; he was the lighting man at the ADC Theatre. He said he fell for me from his lighting box high in the eaves. Once I came on stage, he didn’t look at anyone else. I was in a nursery production of The Sport of My Mad Mother. He didn’t see all the things that I think of when I think of myself: he didn’t think I was fat; he saw someone he really fancied. He thought: ‘That girl’s got oomph.’ He was from Norfolk and he invited me, several times, to stay with his parents. They had boats on the Broads and we went sailing — very Swallows and Amazons. David and I spent a year as an ‘item’. It was easy to meet as we were both at the ADC most of the time, rehearsing: me on the stage, David in the lighting box.

I was cast as the Third Witch in the Marlowe Society’s production of Macbeth, directed by Trevor Nunn. The make-up involved sticking false beards on our faces, but it turned out that I was allergic to the spirit gum and my usually excellent complexion bubbled up into a swollen pus-filled expanse. I kept to my room for fear of running into Lesley Cook. Thankfully, by the first night, the boils had disappeared.

After the Cambridge run, the production travelled to the Theatre Royal, Newcastle. At the first night party, an extremely drunken affair, I met Jack Shepherd. We were to act together ten years later in The Girls of Slender Means and then (less successfully) in The White Devil.

Once in Newcastle, David and I had unfettered time together. We spent hours in bed, enjoying the varieties of positions in our sexual repertoire. David has a remarkable mouth — generous lips — and his kissing technique was excellent. We also had our first major row: when he wouldn’t let me bring fish and chips into the theatre. At the time I couldn’t believe he would come between me and my food, but our fight taught me an unbreakable rule of the theatre.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Адмирал Советского Союза
Адмирал Советского Союза

Николай Герасимович Кузнецов – адмирал Флота Советского Союза, один из тех, кому мы обязаны победой в Великой Отечественной войне. В 1939 г., по личному указанию Сталина, 34-летний Кузнецов был назначен народным комиссаром ВМФ СССР. Во время войны он входил в Ставку Верховного Главнокомандования, оперативно и энергично руководил флотом. За свои выдающиеся заслуги Н.Г. Кузнецов получил высшее воинское звание на флоте и стал Героем Советского Союза.В своей книге Н.Г. Кузнецов рассказывает о своем боевом пути начиная от Гражданской войны в Испании до окончательного разгрома гитлеровской Германии и поражения милитаристской Японии. Оборона Ханко, Либавы, Таллина, Одессы, Севастополя, Москвы, Ленинграда, Сталинграда, крупнейшие операции флотов на Севере, Балтике и Черном море – все это есть в книге легендарного советского адмирала. Кроме того, он вспоминает о своих встречах с высшими государственными, партийными и военными руководителями СССР, рассказывает о методах и стиле работы И.В. Сталина, Г.К. Жукова и многих других известных деятелей своего времени.Воспоминания впервые выходят в полном виде, ранее они никогда не издавались под одной обложкой.

Николай Герасимович Кузнецов

Биографии и Мемуары
100 великих гениев
100 великих гениев

Существует много определений гениальности. Например, Ньютон полагал, что гениальность – это терпение мысли, сосредоточенной в известном направлении. Гёте считал, что отличительная черта гениальности – умение духа распознать, что ему на пользу. Кант говорил, что гениальность – это талант изобретения того, чему нельзя научиться. То есть гению дано открыть нечто неведомое. Автор книги Р.К. Баландин попытался дать свое определение гениальности и составить свой рассказ о наиболее прославленных гениях человечества.Принцип классификации в книге простой – персоналии располагаются по роду занятий (особо выделены универсальные гении). Автор рассматривает достижения великих созидателей, прежде всего, в сфере религии, философии, искусства, литературы и науки, то есть в тех областях духа, где наиболее полно проявились их творческие способности. Раздел «Неведомый гений» призван показать, как много замечательных творцов остаются безымянными и как мало нам известно о них.

Рудольф Константинович Баландин

Биографии и Мемуары
100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии