MYERS
. (SIR
WILFRID. (JUDGE
. I should like to see these letters to which you refer, Sir Wilfrid.(SIR
WILFRIDMYERS
. (JUDGE
. No, Mr. Myers, the King against Potter, and it was reported in nineteen thirty-one. I appeared for the prosecution.MYERS
. And if my memory serves me well, your lordship’s similar objection was sustained.JUDGE
. Your memory for once serves you ill, Mr. Myers. My objection then was overruled by Mr. Justice Swindon—as yours is now, by me.(MYERS
SIR
WILFRID. (USHER
. (POLICEMAN
. (JUDGE
. If these letters are authentic it raises very serious issues. ((
SIR
WILFRID. Mrs. Heilger, you appreciate that you are still on your oath?ROMAINE
. Yes.JUDGE
. Romaine Heilger, you are recalled to this box so that Sir Wilfrid may ask you further questions.SIR
WILFRID. Mrs. Heilger, do you know a certain man whose Christian name is Max?ROMAINE
. (SIR
WILFRID. (ROMAINE
. Certainly not.SIR
WILFRID. You’re quite sure of that?ROMAINE
. I’ve never known anyone called Max. Never.SIR
WILFRID. And yet I believe it’s a fairly common Christian name, or contraction of a name, in your country. You mean that you have never known anyone of that name?ROMAINE
. (SIR
WILFRID. I shall not ask you to throw your mind back such a long way as that. A few weeks will suffice. Let us say—(ROMAINE
. (SIR
WILFRID. A letter.ROMAINE
. I don’t know what you’re talking about.SIR
WILFRID. I’m talking about a letter. A letter written on the seventeenth of October. You remember that date, perhaps.ROMAINE
. Not particularly, why?SIR
WILFRID. I suggest that on that day, you wrote a certain letter—a letter addressed to a man called Max.ROMAINE
. I did nothing of the kind. These are lies that you are telling. I don’t know what you mean.SIR
WILFRID. That letter was one of a series written to the same man over a considerable period of time.ROMAINE
. (SIR
WILFRID. You would seem to have been on—(LEONARD
. ((
(