Читаем GettingThings Done. The Art of Stress-Free Productivity полностью

Theoretically, you should flip your in-basket upside down and process first the first thing that came in. As long as you go from one end clear through to the other within a reasonable period of time, though, it won't make much difference. You're going to see it all in short order anyway. And if you're going to attempt to clear up a big backlog of e-mails staged in "in," you'll actually discover it's more efficient to process the last-in first because of all the discussion threads that accumulate on top of one another.

The in-basket is a processing station, not a storage bin.

 One Item at a Time

You may find you have a tendency, while processing your in-basket, to pick something up, not know exactly what you want to do about it, and then let your eyes wander onto another item farther down the stack and get engaged with it. That item may be more attractive to your psyche because you know right away what to do with it—and you don't feel like thinking about what's in your hand. This is dangerous territory. What's in your hand is likely to land on a "hmppphhh" stack on the side of your desk because you become distracted by something easier, more important, or more interesting below it.

Most people also want to take a whole stack of things out of the in-basket at once, put it right in front of them, and try to crank through it. Although I empathize with the desire to "deal with a big chunk," I constantly remind clients to put back every-thing but the one item on top. The focus on just one thing forces the requisite attention and decision-making to get through all your stuff. And if you get interrupted (which is likely), you won't have umpteen parts of "in" scattered around outside the tray and out of control again. 

The Multitasking Exception

There's a subtle exception to the one-item-at-a-time rule. Some personality types really need to shift their focus away from some-thing for at least a minute in order to make a decision about it.When I see this going on with someone, I let him take two or sometimes three things out at once as he's processing. It's then easier and faster for him to make a choice about the action required.

Remember, multitasking is an exception—and it works only if you hold to the discipline of working through every item in short order, and never avoid any decision for longer than a minute or two.

Nothing Goes Back into "In"

There's a one-way path out of "in." This is actually what was meant by the old admonition to "handle things once," though handling things just once is in fact a bad idea. If you did that, you'd never have a list, because you would finish everything as soon as you saw it. You'd also be highly ineffective and inefficient, since most things you deal with are not to be acted upon the first time you become aware of them. Where the advice does hold is in eliminating the bad habit of continually picking things up out of "in," not deciding what they mean or what you're going to do about them, and then just leaving them there. A better admonition would be, "The first time you pick something up from your in-basket, decide what to do about it and where it goes. Never put it back in "in."

The Key Processing Question: "What's the Next Action?"

You've got the message. You're going to deal with one item at a time. And you're going to make a firm next-action decision about each one. This may sound easy—and it is—but it requires you to do some fast, hard thinking. Much of the time the action will not be self-evident; it will need to be determined.

On that first item, for example, do you need to call someone? Fill something out? Get information from the Web? Buy something at the store? Talk to your secretary? E-mail your boss? What? If there's an action, its specific nature will determine the next set of options. But what if you say, "There's really nothing to do with this"?

I am rather like a mosquito in a nudist camp; I know what I want to do, but I don't know where to begin.

— Stephen Bayne

What If There Is No Action?

It's likely that a portion of your in-basket will require no action. There will be three types of things in this category:

• Trash

• Items to incubate

• Reference material

Trash

If you've been following my suggestions, you'll no doubt already have tossed out a big pile of stuff. It's also likely that you will have put stacks of material into "in" that include things you don't need anymore. So don't be surprised if there's still a lot more to throwaway as you process your stuff.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Практика управления человеческими ресурсами
Практика управления человеческими ресурсами

В книге всемирно известного ученого дан подробный обзор теоретических и практических основ управления человеческими ресурсами. В числе прочих рассмотрены такие вопросы, как процесс управления ЧР; работа и занятость; организационное поведение; обеспечение организации управления трудовыми ресурсами; управление показателями труда; вознаграждение.В десятом издании материал многих глав переработан и дополнен. Это обусловлено значительным развитием УЧР: созданием теории и практики управления человеческим капиталом, повышенным вниманием к роли работников «передней линии», к вопросам разработки и внедрения стратегий УЧР, к обучению и развитию персонала. Все эти темы рассмотрены в новых или существенно переработанных главах. Также в книге приведено много реальных примеров из практики бизнеса.Адресовано слушателям программ МВА, аспирантам, студентам старших курсов, обучающимся по управленческим специальностям, а также профессиональным менеджерам и специалистам по управлению человеческими ресурсами.

Майкл Армстронг

Деловая литература / Деловая литература / Управление, подбор персонала / Финансы и бизнес
Наемные работники: подчинить и приручить
Наемные работники: подчинить и приручить

Сергей Занин — предприниматель, бизнес-тренер и консультант с многолетним опытом. Руководитель Пражской школы бизнеса, автор популярных книг «Бизнес-притчи», «Как преодолеть лень, или Как научиться делать то, что нужно делать», «Деньги. Как заработать и не потерять».Благодаря его книгам и тренингам тысячи людей разобрались в собственных амбициях, целях и трудностях, превратили размытые желания «сделать карьеру», «стать успешным», «обеспечить семью», «реализовать себя» в ясную программу последовательных действий.В новой книге С. Занина вы найдете ответы на вопросы:Почему благие намерения хозяев вызывают сопротивление персонала?Как сократить срок окупаемости работников?Почему кнут эффективнее пряника?Как платить словами вместо денег?Есть ли смысл в программах «командостроительства»?Чем заняты работники, когда их не видит хозяин?Как работники используют слабости хозяина?Почему владелец бизнеса всегда умнее своих работников?К какому типу хозяина или работника вы относитесь?Суждения, высказанные в книге, могут вызвать как полное одобрение, так и неприязнь к автору. Это зависит от того, кем сегодня является читатель — наемным сотрудником или владельцем бизнеса.Сайт Сергея Занина — www.zanin.ru

Сергей Геннадьевич Занин , Сергей Занин

Деловая литература / Карьера, кадры / Маркетинг, PR / Управление, подбор персонала / Финансы и бизнес