Читаем The World Without Us полностью

Lusty drinkers, eucalypti go wherever there’s water, such as along shamba irrigation ditches, where they’ve formed tall hedgerows. Without people, they’ll aim to colonize deserted fields, and they’ll have a head start on the native seeds blowing down the mountain. In the end, it may take a great natural African lumberjack, the elephant, to blaze a trail back to Mount Kenya and expel the last British spirits from the land for good.

<p>2. Africa After Us</p>

In an Africa without humans, as elephants push above the equator through Samburo and then beyond the Sahel, they may find a Sahara Desert in northward retreat, as desertification’s advance troops—goats—become lunch for lions. Or, they may collide with it, as temperatures rising on a wave of a human legacy, elevated atmospheric carbon, quicken its march. That the Sahara has lately advanced so rapidly and alarmingly—in places, two to three miles per year—owes to unfortunate timing.

Only 6,000 years ago, what is now the world’s largest nonpolar desert was green savanna. Crocodiles and hippos wallowed in plentiful Sahara streams. Then Earth’s orbit underwent one of its periodic readjustments. Our tilted axis straightened not even half a degree, but enough to nudge rain clouds around. That alone was not sufficient to turn grasslands to sand dunes. But the coincidence of human progress tipped what was becoming an arid shrubland over a climatic edge. During two previous millennia, in North Africa, Homo sapiens had gone from hunting with spears to growing Middle Eastern grains and raising livestock. They mounted their belongings, and themselves, on newly tamed descendants of an American ungulate that luckily emigrated before its cousins back home perished in a megafaunal holocaust: the camel.

Camels eat grass; grass needs water. So did their masters’ crops, whose bounty begat a population boom of humans. More humans needed more herds, pasture, fields, and more water—all at just the wrong time. No one could have known that the rains had shifted. So people and their flocks ranged farther and grazed harder, assuming that the weather would return to what it had been, and that everything would grow back the way it was.

It didn’t. The more they consumed, the less moisture transpired skyward and the less it rained. The result was the hot Sahara we see today. Only it used to be smaller: Over this past century, the numbers of Africa’s humans and their animals have been rising, and now temperatures are, too. This leaves the precarious sub-Saharan tier of Sahel countries at the brink of sliding into the sand.

Farther south, equatorial Africans have herded animals for several thousand years and hunted them even longer, yet between wildlife and humans there was actually mutual benefit: As pastoralists such as Kenya’s Maasai shepherded cattle among pastures and water holes, their spears ready to discourage lions, wildebeest tagged along to take advantage of the predator protection. They, in turn, were followed by their zebra companions. The nomads economized by eating meat sparingly, learning to live on their flocks’ milk and blood, which they drew by carefully tapping and staunching their cattle’s jugular veins. Only when drought reduced fodder for their herds did they fall back on hunting, or trade with bushmen tribes that still lived off game.

This balance among humans, flora, and fauna first began to shift when humans became prey themselves—or rather, commodities. Like our kin the chimpanzees, we’d always murdered one another over territory and mates. But with the rise of slavery, we were reduced to something new: an export crop.

The mark that slavery left on Africa can be seen today in southeastern Kenya, in brushy country known as Tsavo, an eerie landscape of lava-flows, flat-topped tortilis acacias, myrrh, and baobab trees. Because Tsavo’s tsetse flies discouraged cattle herding, it remained a hunting ground for Waata bushmen. Their game included elephant, giraffe, cape buffalo, assorted gazelles, klipspringer, and another striped antelope: the kudu, its horns corkscrewing for an amazing six feet.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Психология стресса
Психология стресса

Одна из самых авторитетных и знаменитых во всем мире книг по психологии и физиологии стресса. Ее автор — специалист с мировым именем, выдающийся биолог и психолог Роберт Сапольски убежден, что человеческая способность готовиться к будущему и беспокоиться о нем — это и благословение, и проклятие. Благословение — в превентивном и подготовительном поведении, а проклятие — в том, что наша склонность беспокоиться о будущем вызывает постоянный стресс.Оказывается, эволюционно люди предрасположены реагировать и избегать угрозы, как это делают зебры. Мы должны расслабляться большую часть дня и бегать как сумасшедшие только при приближении опасности.У зебры время от времени возникает острая стрессовая реакция (физические угрозы). У нас, напротив, хроническая стрессовая реакция (психологические угрозы) редко доходит до таких величин, как у зебры, зато никуда не исчезает.Зебры погибают быстро, попадая в лапы хищников. Люди умирают медленнее: от ишемической болезни сердца, рака и других болезней, возникающих из-за хронических стрессовых реакций. Но когда стресс предсказуем, а вы можете контролировать свою реакцию на него, на развитие болезней он влияет уже не так сильно.Эти и многие другие вопросы, касающиеся стресса и управления им, затронуты в замечательной книге профессора Сапольски, которая адресована специалистам психологического, педагогического, биологического и медицинского профилей, а также преподавателям и студентам соответствующих вузовских факультетов.

Борис Рувимович Мандель , Роберт Сапольски

Биология, биофизика, биохимия / Психология и психотерапия / Учебники и пособия ВУЗов