king of the monkeys in the
In the opening chapters of
Wu Cfreng-en^ novel clearly is grounded in an oral tradi- tion, and it really demands the kind of leisurely presentation that oral narration imposes on a story. It doesn't necessarily lend itself to the kind of straight-through assault that is the modern approach to reading a book. I would recommend that you start with Arthur Waley's wonderfully translated and greatly condensed version, published under the title
J.S.M.
MICHEL EYQUEM DE MONTAIGNE
1533-1592
Selected Essays
Many names on our list are far greater than Montaigne's. But the view of life he represents is so deeply rooted in many of us that, while more powerful minds retain interest only for schol- ars, he will continue to capture the attention of the average intelligent reader. He appeals to that part of us more fasci- nated by the questions than by the answers.
Montaigne, one of the pioneers of modern French prose, was of good merchant-family stock. On his mothers side he was partly Jewish. Apparently there was sufficient money in the family to permit him on his thirty-eighth birthday to semi- retire to his round tower on the family property. In a period when educational experimentation was generally popular, his own education was unusual. Until he was six he spoke only Latin. He tells us that he was awakened each morning by "the sound of a musical instrument,,> an anticipation of our clock rбdios. He studied law, occupied a magistrate^ seat in the Bordeaux parliament, served in various capacities under three French kings, and during his later years wasted some of his genius on a job, the mayoralty of Bordeaux, fit only for medioc- rity. His real life is preserved in his
As he says in his preliminary word to the reader, they were composed not for fame, favor, or fortune, but merely to por- tray himself, in ali candor and indiscretion. For this purpose he invented a new form of literature, as important in its way as the internai combustion engine, and far more pleasant. The
French word
Montaigne's essays are not like those we find in our better magazines today. They are formless, they rarely stick to the announced subject, and they are chock-full of classical quota- tions; for Montaigne, in addition to being a man of practical affairs, was a learned humanist. The modern reader may at first find these obstacles irritating.