Jesus will always be the center of Christianity, but the “Jesus” who most influenced history was the “Jesus Christ” of Paul, not the historical figure of Jesus. There is a double irony here. Paul became the most influential defining figure for later Christianity, even beyond the historical Jesus, but he is also a man waiting to be discovered, even after nearly two thousand years. Paul transformed Jesus himself, with his message of a messianic kingdom of justice and peace on earth, to the symbol of a religion of otherworldly salvation in a heavenly world. Recovering the authentic Paul, as he was in his own time, and from his own words, is my task in this book. All of us, whether Christian or not, whether wittingly or unwittingly, are heirs of Paul, since the parameters of Christ and his heavenly kingdom created by Paul were what shaped Christian civilization.
ONE
CHRISTIANITY BEFORE PAUL
I grew up thinking that the “lost years” of early Christianity referred to Jesus’ childhood and his early twenties. The gospels only record a single story from his youth.1 I had no idea there was a much more significant gap of “missing years” in the history of early Christianity, much less a forgotten brother of Jesus.2 Paul calls him “James the brother of the Lord,” and it is James, not Peter, who takes over leadership of the movement following Jesus’ death. Paul met James face-to-face, in Jerusalem, on at least three separate occasions.3 In later tradition he is called “James the Just” to distinguish him from the other James, the Galilean fisherman, the son of Zebedee and brother of John, and one of the twelve apostles.4
Who was this James, the brother of Jesus, and why was he forgotten? And what kind of shape had the early Christian movement taken, under his leadership, before Paul even came on the scene? The Roman Catholic Church looks to Peter while the Protestants have focused on Paul, but James seems to have been deliberately marginalized, as we will see. The tradition most people know is that the apostle Peter took over leadership of the movement as head of the Twelve. Not long afterward the apostle Paul, newly “converted” to the Christian movement from Judaism, joined Peter’s side. Together the apostles Peter and Paul became the twin “pillars” of the emerging Christian faith, preaching the gospel to the entire Roman world and dying gloriously, together under the emperor Nero, as martyrs in Rome—the new divinely appointed headquarters of the Church. This view of things has been enshrined in Christian art through the ages and popularized in books and films. Indeed, Peter’s primacy, as the first pope, has even become the cornerstone of Roman Catholic dogmatic teaching. We now know that things did not happen this way.
As we will see, the original apostolic Christianity that came before Paul, and developed independently of him, by those who had known and spent time with Jesus, was in sharp contrast to Paul’s version of the new faith. This lost Christianity held sway during Paul’s lifetime, and only with the death of James in A.D. 62, followed by the brutal destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in A.D. 70, did it begin to lose its influence as the center of the Jesus movement. Ironically, it was the production and final editing of the New Testament itself, in the early second century A.D., supporting Paul’s version of Christianity, that ensured first the marginalization, and subsequently the death of this original form of Christianity within Christian orthodoxy. By the fourth century A.D., the dominant Roman church classified surviving forms of this Jewish Christianity as heresy and Christians were forbidden under threat of penalties to follow any kind of Jewish observances.
One of my theses in this book is that the form of Christianity that subsequently developed as a thriving religion in the late Roman Empire was heavily based upon the ecstatic and visionary experiences of Paul. Christianity, as we came to know it,