“The individual” and “the inner” are key words that appear repeatedly throughout the sixteen lectures. Harnack repeats the expression drawn from Augustine, “God and the soul, the soul and its God,” almost like a mantra. It is evident on its face that a message of Jesus like the one that is here—supposedly—brought out of its shell has nothing to do with the people of God and does not intend to. Harnack reveals that already, in anticipation, in the first lecture: “Jesus Christ’s teaching will at once bring us by steps which, if few, will be great, to a height where its connexion with Judaism is seen to be only a loose one.”15 Finally, in the tenth lecture, Paul will definitively “deliver” the “Christian religion from Judaism,”16 for Paul, with his knowledge, confidence, and strength, set this “new religion” “in competition with the Israelitish religion.”17
The degree to which such idiotic notions are complicit in the calamitous history of the twentieth century need not be discussed here. In any case, it is highly dangerous to separate Christianity from Israel and commit oneself to theological individualism.
Harnack was by no means alone in his narrowing of the message of Jesus to the individual. He was, in fact, representative of a broad current of liberal theology at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth. The idea that the reign of God has to do only with individuals and is something profoundly internal was widely accepted at the time, especially in segments of Protestant theology. There were corresponding phenomena in Catholic theology and piety. The motto of countless parish missions, “save your soul!” is very familiar.
The Reign of God Within
There is a saying of Jesus in the gospels that appears to support the internal nature of the reign of God invoked by Harnack and many others. Harnack quotes it several times in his lectures. It is in Luke’s gospel, at the end of a short narrative that prepares us for the saying itself:
Once he was asked by the Pharisees when the reign of God was coming, and he answered, “The reign of God is not coming with things that can be observed; nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There it is!’ For, in fact, the reign of God is [already] among you [
].” (Luke 17:20-21)
Most translations today render
But there is no point in pursuing the structure preceding the saying too intensively here. In Luke’s sense of things the Pharisees are apparently asking for signs (portents) of the reign of God, as the disciples in Mark 13:4 ask about signs foretelling the end of the world. Jesus answers that there are no such (visible) signs ahead of time. Why? Simply because the reign of God is already present. Because it already exists there is no point in looking for it “here” or “there” (cf. Mark 13:21).
Of course, the crucial question is
But Martin Luther—and this is what makes Luke 17:21 so explosive—translated