Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

In 1938, Salazar’s New State created the Board of Export of Colonial Cotton (Junta de Exportação do Algodão Colonial), an economic coordinating organ, part of the corporatist structure institutionalized by the constitution of 1933 that made it the more developed corporatist regime of the fascist family. The Board not only organized cotton exports from the colonies; it also intervened directly in the process of capturing the peasantry for cotton production. The Board designated the areas in each concession for growing cotton, and, in accordance with the standardization tasks of many of the corporatist organisms, it also defined the various qualities of cotton and set the price paid to the peasants by concessionary companies and to the concessionary companies by Portugal’s textile industry. With the colonial state guaranteeing cotton purchase price independently of prices in international markets, concessionaries were quick to intensify its efforts to force natives into production. In 1940, only two years after the Board implemented its new system, there were already, and only for the northern provinces, about half a million natives incorporated in the cotton regime. For the entire territory of Mozambique the numbers reached about 800,000. From 1942 to 1946, out of a total of 28 million tons of cotton imported by Portugal, 24 million were produced in the African colonies. Cotton had become in a few years the first Mozambican export, the northern region producing about 60 percent of all colonial cotton.[99]

These numbers that delighted Salazar and strengthened his imperial vision were directly related to one of the darkest pages of Portuguese colonialism. Historiography has detailed the brutal character of Portugal’s cotton regime and its systematic use of violence. Daily beatings and whipping by colonial officers and concessionaries’ foremen were the norm to force peasants into cotton plots and leave to second place food crops. Allen Isaacman offers a detailed survey of the grim stories, rumors, gossip, and songs depicting the colonial state sanctioned violence spread out through the Mozambican countryside.[100] As a case in point, consider the guerrilla war for Mozambican independence begun in 1961 by FRELIMO in those northern cotton districts where the culture was more present, when several thousand cotton growers demonstrated for better labor conditions. There are many different versions of what happened in the village of Mueda, but Eduardo Mondlane, the founder of FRELIMO, had no doubts about making the killing of unarmed protesters by the colonial police a founding myth of the would-be postcolonial country, converting the cotton regime into the main symbol of Portuguese oppression.[101] In his book Struggle for the Independence of Mozambique, published in 1969, the same year he was murdered by Portugal’s secret police, Mondlane recollected various statements of poverty, violence, and hunger associated with the cotton regime.[102]

It was in the brutal context of the cotton regime that the anarcho-syndicalist Aurélio Quintanilha was supposed to lead the Center for Cotton Scientific Research (Centro de Investigação Científica Algodoeira—CICA). The Center created in 1943 was the scientific branch of the Colonial Cotton Board, with several disciplines gathered around one unique object: cotton. To cover the multiplicity of issues related to cotton were created the departments of genetics, entomology, soil, botany, phytopathology, fiber technology, agricultural engineering and regional experiment stations.[103]

The establishment of a network of experimental fields distributed through the entire Mozambican territory was CICA’s first realization. Essays on 39 experimentation sites offered basic results about proper sowing timing, behavior of different breeds, and cultivation rotations.[104] More than anything, these first essays covering the different regions should produce enough information on the fundamental issue of where to plant cotton. The policy of just enrolling through coercion a growing number of natives led to the cultivation of cotton in improper areas with fast erosion of soils in vast areas.[105] Textile factory owners in Portugal also complained about the lack of reliability of colonial cotton with large annual variations of quantity and quality. In 1945, the number of cotton producers began to decrease and would stabilize around 500,000 for the next two decades, with some of the previous cultivated areas even being interdicted for cotton production. To compensate, cultivation was to be intensified in the most suitable ones.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное