Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

BRA researchers in Berlin-Dahlem would improve this method and convert it into the standard procedure for testing varieties for wart resistance from 1930 on. Köhler and Lemmerzahl, building also on work from Mary D. Glynne at the British Rothamsted Experimental Station, replaced the winter sporangia with summer sporangia obtained from warted tissues collected from infected potatoes. By inoculating summer sporangia directly into the tuber sprouts, ideally when the sprouts were about 2 millimeters long, infections were detected already after 4 hours of inoculation. This so-called Glynne-Lemmerzahl method not only saved a considerable amount of time; it also made it possible to circumvent the use of large amounts of wart compost, which the previous method had required. It also required much less laboratory space. By 1929 the BRA had tested resistance to wart disease in about 10,000 breeding lines, a number that would climb to 30,000 in 1936 and that justified every effort to streamline inoculation procedures.[34]

Figure 3.4 Greenhouses of the Biologische Reichsanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Berlin-Dahlem, 1936.(Die Biologische Reichsanstalt für Land und Forstwirtschaft in Berlin-Dahlem, Paul Parey, 1936)

Success in identifying susceptibility to wart would make resistance to that disease an exemplary case for a cleansing of the seed market. Through application of the Glynne-Lemmerzahl method on a grand scale, non-resistant varieties were to be eliminated from the German fields. As has already been mentioned, potato farmers had about 1,500 varieties at their disposal by the end of the 1910s.[35] The launching of Varietal Registering Committees (Sortenregisterkomissionen) for potatoes shortly after the war by Appel in conjunction with the German Agricultural Society (DLG), an initiative not extended to cereals until 1927, was aimed at sorting out “original varieties” from cheap imitations as a way to reduce the number of varieties and allow farmers to make better-informed decisions.[36] In the 1920s the DLG began to distribute to its members an annual booklet of approved varieties. During the Nazi regime, that booklet would evolve into an official Imperial List of Approved Varieties (Reichssortenliste).

The research on wart disease had also led to an important development in the methodology for classifying potato varieties. The close attention to tuber sprouts demanded by the Lemmerzahl-Glynne method revealed their usefulness as markers of different varieties. Soon BRA researchers developed, parallel to the inoculation method, a new biological basis for establishing equivalence or distinction between varieties on the basis of observation of the form, size, and color of tuber sprouts—the so-called sprout test (Lichtkeimprüfung).[37] Before a commercial variety could make the list of approved varieties, it had to demonstrate its distinctiveness (Selbständigkeit) in relation to existent varieties. Before BRA researchers began to publish the list of varieties, seed merchants could simply cultivate other breeders’ creations, rename them, and sell them as their own at a cheaper price. Distinctiveness was based on characteristics (Merkmalen) such as color and form of the tuber and, after K. Snell’s work by the end of the 1920s, also on certain features of the sprouts.[38] But distinctiveness was not enough to gain entry to the list. A variety developed by a commercial breeder had also to possess interesting agronomic qualities (Eigenschaften) of yield, resistance, adaptability to different soils, color of pulp, or tuber form. To be on the list, potatoes had thus to pass through the standardized tests of the BRA that established their biological characteristics and agronomic qualities. In short, BRA researchers developed quick laboratory testing methods to guide commercial breeders’ work as well as to identify the varieties that should or should not be included in the list of approved varieties.[39]

<p>The BRA and the RNS: The Streamlined Estate and the 1934 Seed Decree</p>
Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное