Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

Potato wart had arrived to all the major European potato-producing countries at the turn of the century as a result of the importing of South American varieties to overcome the late blight attacks that had led to the Irish potato famine.[26] The wart fungus traveled with potatoes from Chile or Peru, infecting European soils cultivated with non-resistant varieties. Though infected potato plants did not appear damaged above the ground, the tip of the stolon (where the tuber is formed) developed a gall instead of a tuber. A severe wart infestation might destroy an entire crop by preventing tuber growth. Soon after the arrival of wart disease in England, some commercial varieties were spotted as being immune to the fungus. In 1909 the English Ministry of Agriculture was supporting field trials that would demonstrate that the immunity of potato varieties didn’t change with changing environments, identifying it as a single Mendelian trait that could be transmitted to other varieties.[27] This work would have important consequences for potato breeding in subsequent years, with breeders aiming at developing varieties resistant to the multiple diseases affecting the potato crop and overcoming the generalized view that disease resistance and high yield couldn’t be combined in the same variety.[28]

Figure 3.3 The main Building of the Biologische Reichsanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Berlin-Dahlem, 1936.(Die Biologische Reichsanstalt für Land und Forstwirtschaft in Berlin-Dahlem, Paul Parey, 1936)

Wart disease was first detected in Germany in 1908 in Westphalia. By 1927 it was present in every region of the country.[29] In 1915, during World War I, the first field trials for wart resistance in German commercial varieties were undertaken in Münster, Cronenberg, and Lübeck.[30] Only seven varieties among the 169 tested in the years 1915–1918 had the desired immunity. The main problem in conducting such trials was how to efficiently test in the field the huge number of varieties produced by commercial breeders. At least a year was required to raise the necessary tubers, after which susceptibility might be evident in the next season. Immunity could not be proved in less than two or three years of repeated exposure to an infected soil. This was not a suitable method in the years after World War I, when German farmers were growing about 1,500 varieties of potatoes.[31] The BRA, under Appel’s leadership, would strive to solve both problems. Not only would the BRA develop laboratory methods to quickly try a much larger number of varieties as alternative to time-consuming field methods; it also would try to bring order to the seed market by drastically reducing the number of potato varieties available to German farmers. The double strategy of transforming potatoes into laboratory objects and establishing a list of proper varieties to be cultivated would become the hallmark of the work undertaken at the BRA.

Crucially, the difficulties experienced in inducing germination of even a small percentage of sporangia of Synchytrium endobiotiocum—the fungus responsible for wart—undermined any in vitro tests.[32] It was not possible to follow the traditional chemical approach to plant pathology of first identifying the conditions that bring the death of the sporangium in vitro and then transferring such conditions to the field by soil sterilization through chemical fungicides. The control of wart disease was to be achieved by the breeding of immune varieties of potatoes and not by the use of chemical pesticides.

The success of such breeding program relied heavily on the ability to quickly identify immune varieties. Spieckermann and Kotthoff, at the Münster Haupstelle für Pflanzenschutz, were the first ones to develop, in 1925, a simple method of inoculation to test the susceptibility of potatoes to wart disease. They cut potatoes of various varieties into pieces, placed them in a box side by side over a layer of humid sand with the eyes turned up, and covered them with Krebscompost, a compost rich in winter sporangia prepared from warted material.[33] In non-resistant varieties, the infection spread through the eyes and was soon made manifest by the formation of a gall.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное