Ваша жизнь в ваших руках. Как понять, победить и предотвратить рак груди и яичников

6. e.g. Baum, М., 2000. Survival and reduction in mortality from breast cancer – Impact of mammographic screening is hot clear (Letter). BMJ, 321, 1470.

7. Spurgeon, David, 2002. Annual mammography in women in their 40s does not cut death rate. BMJ, 325, 563.

8. Spurgeon, David, 2002. Annual mammography in women in their 40s does not cut death rate. BMJ, 325, 563.

9. Josefson, Deborah, 2002. Breast self-examination does not improve cancer survival. BMJ, 325, 793.

10. Zackrisson S. and others, 2006. Rare of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15years after end of Malmo mammographic screening trial; follow up study. BMJ, 332, 689–692.

11. Anon, 2006. Screening for breast cancer. BMJ, 332, 499–500.

12. Symonds, R. Paul, 2002. Cancer biology may be more important than diagnostic delay. BMJ, 325, 774.

13. Spurgeon, David, 2002. Annual mammography in women in their 40s does not cut death rate. BMJ, 325, 563.

14. www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen

15. White, Caroline, 2002. ‘Unacceptable’ errors found in breast screening process. BMJ, 324, 933.

16. UK National Radiological Protection Board, www.nrpb.org/ radiation_topics/risks/exposure.htm

17. Irwig, Les, 2006. Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer. BMJ, 332, 678–679.

18. www.well-connected.com/rreports/doc06full.html

19. www.well-connected.con’i/rreports/doc06full.html

20. Keyomarsi, K., Tucker, S.L., Buchholz, T.A., Callister, M., Ding, Y., Hortobagyi, G.N., Bedrosian, I. Knickerbocker, C., Toyofuku, W, Lowe, M., Herliczek, T.W, and Bacus, S.S., 2002. Cyclin E and Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med, 347, 1566–1575.

21. Yancik, R. and Ries, L.A., 1994. Cancer in older persons. Magnitude of the problem – how do we apply what we know? Cancer, 74 (7 Suppl), 1995–2003.

22. Silliman, R.A. and Baeke, P., 1998. Breast cancer in the older woman. In: Balducci, L., Ersher, W B. and Lyman, G.H., Comprehensive geriatric oncology. Amsterdam: Harwood.

23. Welch, H.G., Albertson, EC., Nease, R.E, Bubolz, T.A. and Wasson, J.H., 1996. Estimating treatment benefits for the elderly: the effect of competing risks. Ann Intern Med, 124, 577–584.

24. Holmes, EE, 1994. Clinical course of cancer in the elderly. Cancer Control, 1, 108–114.

25. Nixon, A.J., Neuberg, D., Hayes, D.E, Gelman, R., Connolly, J.L., Schnitt, S. and others, 1994. Relationship of patient age to pathological features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer./ Clin Oncol, 12, 888–894.

26. Balducci, Lodovico and Phillips, D. Melissa. 1998. Breast cancer in older women. American Family Physician. October 1, 1998. www.aafp.org/afp/981001 ap/balducci.html

27. www.well-connected.com/rreports/doc06full.html

28. Medical Report: Prostate Cancer. ICON, 2002, 1 (5), 8-10.

29. Waxman, Jonathan, 2001. The Prostate Cancer Book. London: Vermillion.

30. http://www.nccn.org/paticnt_gls/_english/_prostate/

31. http://www.nccn.org/patient_gls/_english/_prostate/

32. Hart, D. and Wall, 2004. UK population dose from medical examinations. European Journal of Radiology, 50 (3), 285–291, Brenner, D.I. and others, 2001. CT scanning of children has been calculated 10 increase their lifetime risk of cancer. American Journal of Roentology, 176, 289–296.

33. http://www.nccn.org/patient_gls/_english/_prostate/

34. http://www.cancer.org

35. Spurgeon, David, 2003. Advanced scanning techniques help doctors stage prostate cancer. BMJ, 326, 1418.

36. New England Journal of Medicine, 2003, 348, 2491–2499.

37. http://www.nccn.org/patient_gls/_english/_prostate/

38. Fisher, B. and others, 2002. Twenty year follow-up of a randomised trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 347 (16), 1233–1241.

39. Fisher, B., Bryant, J., Dignam, J.J., Wickerham, D.L., Mamou-nas, E.F., Fisher, E.R., Margolese, KG., Nesbitt, L., Paik, S., Pisansky, T.M., Wolmark, N., 2002. Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less./ Clin Oncol, 20 (20), 4141–4149; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; 80

40. Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R.G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E.R., Jeong, J.H. and Wolmark, N., 2002. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomised trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 347 (16), 1233–1241; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; 80

41. Gottlieb, Scott. Lumpectomy is as effective as mastectomy for breast cancer. BMJ, 325, 921.

42. www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002919.htm

43. www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002919. htm