craft by a set of standards unfamiliar to the Victorians. He sought the perfect form for each of his stories. He searched human character in depth, fearless of what he might find there. He sought out wonderfully suggestive symbols (such as the silver mine in
But before we read
First, he is not a writer of "sea stories," much less of adven- ture stories. He is a psychological novelist who happens to be exploiting material he knew intimately.
Second, though he wrote many tales of the East Indies, he is not an "exotic" novelist. Local color is there, of course, laid on with a painters eye, but again this is subordinate to his interest in the roiled depths of the human heart.
Third, he is not, except superficially, a "romantic." The tests of fidelity, fortitude, and understanding to which he submits his characters are ruthlessly true to the human condition as seen by a most unsentimental eye. Conrad does not flee or evade, nor, despite his sense that life itself is a kind of dream, does he take refuge in dreams. He is far more realistic than a Sinclair Lewis.
Critics always quote one sentence from his famous Preface to
seeing that has the depth, clarity, and often agony of a vision, visible only when the mind and the imagination are at full ten- sion. Once we grasp this, the sentence may stand as a short- hand summary of Conrad's ideal relationship to the ideal reader: "My task which I am trying to achieve is, by the power of the written word, to make you hear, to make you feel—it is, above ali, to make you see. That—and no more, and it is everything."
For additional reading in Conrad I would suggest three long short stories: "Heart of Darkness," "The End of the Tether," and "Youth."
C.F.
101
ANTON CHEKHOV
1860-1904
The experience of reading Chekhovs plays is never quite satis- factory, because the readers imagination must meet a difficult challenge. The page cries out for the stage. The words demand the actors voice. The dialogue is not tidy and explicit, as with Shaw [99], but more like ordinary conversation. It is marked by breaks, pauses that make their own statements, involuntary gestures, small digressions, abrupt transitions, incomplete thoughts, careless syntax. Chekhovs apparently inconsequen- tial talk is designed to reflect the contradictions, the confu- sions, the frustrations hidden deep within his characters.
Chekhov has no program. A doctor by profession, he has some of the physician^ requisite detachment. He does not care about changing your mind; he cares only about telling the truth about the human heart. He wants to make you feel what lies behind the daily, the ostensibly trivial. As playwright he has no option, words are his only mйdium. But these words he thinks of as a mere screen. His business is to reveal holes and gaps in the screen, thus allowing us glimpses of the reality it conceals.
In these respects, as in others, Chekhov contributed some- thing new, as did Ibsen, to the art of the playwright. Since Chekhov, the serious theater has never been quite the same.