Unlike its original, the
These statements made, I have three suggestions for the
reader:
н. Read Joyce's A
In this one case, read a good commentary first. The best short one, I think, is by Edmund Wilson, the best long ones by Stuart Gilbert and Anthony Burgess.
Even then
As you read it, try to keep in mind some of Joyce's pur- poses:
To trace, as completely as possible, the thoughts and doings of a number of Dubliners during the day and night of June 16, 1904.
To trace, virtually completely, the thoughts and doings of two of them: Stephen Dedalus, the now classic type of the modern intellectual, and his spiritual father, the more or less aver- age man, Leopold Bloom.
To give his book a form paralleling (not always obviously) the events and characters of the
To invent or develop whatever new techniques were needed for his monumental task. These included, among dozens, interior monologue, stream of consciousness, parody, dream and nightmare sequences, puns, word coinages, unconventional punctuation or none at ali, and so forth. Ordinary novelists try to satisfy us with a selection from or summary of their charac- ters' thoughts. Joyce gives you the thoughts themselves, in ali their streamy, dreamy, formless flow.
Even the attempt to read
At this writing probably the best edition to use is the 1986 Vintage Books (Random House) paperback, described as "The corrected text edited by Hans Walter Gabler with Wolfhard Steppe and Claus Melchior." Perhaps even better is the edition by John Kidd (Norton, 1994).
C.F.
I I I
VIRGНNIA WOOLF
1882-1941
Three names among the brilliant but overpublicized Bloomsbury group have not only survived but grown more impressive with the passage of time: those of the economist John Maynard Keynes and the novelists E.M. Forster and Virginia Woolf. Long before her death in 1941 Woolf had already begun to influence decisively the course of the English novel. That influence has continued to expand. We can legiti- mately claim that, along with Conrad [100], Henry James [96], Proust [105], and Joyce [110] (whom she did not admire), she is truly seminal.
To put it in formula terms, she demonstrated that the accepted realistic English novelists of the first quarter of the century—Arnold Bennett, John Galsworthy, H.G. Wells—suf- fered from an inadequate view of the resources of their art. They dealt in surfaces, as she argued in her trail-breaking essay "Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown." She proposed to get under- neath these surfaces by using devices that have become familiar—stream of consciousness, interior monologue, the aban- donment of linear narrative, and a sensitive adaptation of some of the techniques of poetry. At times she failed in her endeavor; more often she succeeded.
Of the four novйis here recommended,
In