Читаем The Icon and the Axe полностью

humanist, even in prophecy. There is a poetic quality to his denunciation of the three evil passions: "love of sweets, praise and silver" (slastoliubie, slavoliubie, srebroliubie).™ He defends his efforts to correct faulty translations in Russian churchbooks, and pleads with those who have placed him in monastic imprisonment at least to let him return quietly to his library: "If I am wrong, subject me not to contempt, but to correction, and let me return to Athos."61 Maxim always felt close to this center of the contemplative life and of Hesychast spirituality. Opposition to clerical wealth and ' dogmatism forged a link between his early humanist teachers from Italy and his later monastic followers from the upper Volga. ¦jf* Mj^om opposed the Josephite defense of monastic wealth not only for f bringmg_^a_MaspJiemous, servile, Jewish love of silver"62 into holy places, I but jSscTforJ^ J In the course of hliTsustained" Hebate^wTth tffiTTosiphite Metropolitan /f Daniel of JMoscow, Maxim voicesThe fear that the church is coming under J the authority of ^??????????^??^?^???? than "just rules" (pravila) -thus . anticipatmgjthe_ opposition between "crook^dn£sXLand^4nith"-(krivda-pravda) which was to become so important in Russian moral ^pjlilosoghy.63 In a sEllful dialogue, Maxim likens the Josephite argument that monastic property is a common trust to a group of sensualists' justifying their relations with a prostitute on the grounds that she "belongs to us all in common."64

Maxim gradually turned to political writings denouncing Tsar Vasily Ill's divorce, ancTunsuccessfully attempting to make young Ivan IV "the just" rather than "the terrible." Maxim's political philosophy was moralistic

•? /? rv

and conservative: a kind of moral rearmament program designed by a sympathetic foreigner for the less-educated leader of an underdeveloped area. All ponflict can be resolved without changing" the social order. The firstTask is to infuse the prince with moral fervor. "Nothing is so necessary to those rulingon earth as justice";65 but no prince can ultimately be just without the accompanying virtues of personal purity and humility.66

The fall of Byzantium was a moral warning to Muscovy against pride

and complacence in high places rather than an_assurance that Moscow was

now the "third Rome^Tn a letter ?6~ young Ivan TV Maxim implies that

adherence to the~true faith will not in itself guarantee God's favor to an

unjust prince, because evil Christian kings have often been struck down,

and a just pagan like Cyrus of Persia enjoyed God's favor "for his great jus

tice, humility, and compassion."orMaxim juxtaposed the classical Byzantine

idea of a symphony of power between imperial and priestly authority to the

Muscovite arguments for unlimited tsarist power. Like his friend Karpov,

Maxim explicitly said that the tsar should not interfere^rf the ecclesiasticaO^

sphere, and implfedjthat he was ?????^^??????^by a higher

moral la\£

This foreign teacher was revered, however, not for the logicjrfJiifL

arguments or the beauty of his style but for the depth of his piety. In his early~yeaTTTfe argued for a crusade to liberate Constantinople and for a preventive war against the Crimean khan;68 but as time went on, the simple Pauline ideals of good cheer, humility, and compassion dominate his writings. In and out of monastic'prisons, confronted with false accusations, torture, and near starvation, Maxim underscored with his own life his doctrine of love through long-suffering. Far from showing bitterness toward the ungrateful land to which he had come, he developed a love of Russia, and an image of it different from that of the bombastic Josephite monks in the Tsar's entourage.

Maxim shows almost no interest in the mechanics of rule or the possibilities of practical reform, but he feelscompassion for the oppressed and sorrow,.fpr the wealthy in Muscovy, He is convinced thaT"the heart of a mother grieving for her children deprived of the necessities of life is not so full as the soul of a faithful Tsar grieving for the protection and peaceful well-being of his beloved subjects."69 Whatever its faults, Russia is not a tyranny like that of the Tatars. She bears the holy mission of Christian rule in the East, through alt her harassment from without_and corruption from within.

Toward the end of his life and during the early years of Ivan the Terrible's reign, Maxim transposes the image of the fallen church in Savonarola's De ruina ecclesiae into that of a ruined Russian empire.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Эра Меркурия
Эра Меркурия

«Современная эра - еврейская эра, а двадцатый век - еврейский век», утверждает автор. Книга известного историка, профессора Калифорнийского университета в Беркли Юрия Слёзкина объясняет причины поразительного успеха и уникальной уязвимости евреев в современном мире; рассматривает марксизм и фрейдизм как попытки решения еврейского вопроса; анализирует превращение геноцида евреев во всемирный символ абсолютного зла; прослеживает историю еврейской революции в недрах революции русской и описывает три паломничества, последовавших за распадом российской черты оседлости и олицетворяющих три пути развития современного общества: в Соединенные Штаты, оплот бескомпромиссного либерализма; в Палестину, Землю Обетованную радикального национализма; в города СССР, свободные и от либерализма, и от племенной исключительности. Значительная часть книги посвящена советскому выбору - выбору, который начался с наибольшего успеха и обернулся наибольшим разочарованием.Эксцентричная книга, которая приводит в восхищение и порой в сладостную ярость... Почти на каждой странице — поразительные факты и интерпретации... Книга Слёзкина — одна из самых оригинальных и интеллектуально провоцирующих книг о еврейской культуре за многие годы.Publishers WeeklyНайти бесстрашную, оригинальную, крупномасштабную историческую работу в наш век узкой специализации - не просто замечательное событие. Это почти сенсация. Именно такова книга профессора Калифорнийского университета в Беркли Юрия Слёзкина...Los Angeles TimesВажная, провоцирующая и блестящая книга... Она поражает невероятной эрудицией, литературным изяществом и, самое главное, большими идеями.The Jewish Journal (Los Angeles)

Юрий Львович Слёзкин

Культурология