The book of Acts mentions James one other time, when Paul has returned to Jerusalem toward the end of the 50s A.D. The day after his arrival Paul went to “visit James and all the elders were present” (Acts 21:18). Once again it is clear that James is leader of the group and Paul knows he must account to him. There had been a serious charge raised against Paul, based on rumors that had circulated as to what he was preaching in Asia Minor and Greece. The claim was that Paul himself, as a Jew, had given up an observant Jewish life and that he was privately teaching other fellow Jews that they could do the same (Acts 21:17–26). Presumably this action might involve such things as dietary laws, observance of the Sabbath day and other Jewish holy days, and even the requirement of male circumcision (Galatians 4:10; Colossians 2:16–17). It is noteworthy that Luke, who wants to present a perfect picture of harmony and agreement between Paul and James, does not actually say that Paul denied this charge, but only that Paul allowed James and the other leaders in Jerusalem to think that it was not true.
Acts presents both of Paul’s meetings with James and the Jerusalem apostles and elders as harmonious and positive. Fortunately we have Paul’s side of the story in his letters and we know there was a diametrically opposite outcome. The irony of the Luke-Acts portrayal of James is quite amazing. James is mentioned only twice, both times in the book of Acts in an account that stretches over a thirty-year period. James is not even identified as Jesus’ brother, yet those two scenes, separated by ten years, offer us the strongest kind of historical evidence that James presided over the Twelve as leader of the Christian movement.
To get the details of how James assumed this role of leadership, beyond what the letters of Paul indicate, we have to go to sources outside the New Testament. The
The disciples said to Jesus, “We know you will leave us. Who is going to be our leader then?” Jesus said to them, “No matter where you go you are to
Here we have an outright statement, placed in the mouth of Jesus, that he is handing over the leadership and spiritual direction of his movement to James. One should keep in mind that the
Clement of Alexandria, who wrote in the late second century A.D., is another early source that confirms this succession of James. Clement writes: “Peter and James [the fisherman] and John after the Ascension of the Savior did not struggle for glory, because they had previously been given honor by the Savior, but chose James the Just as Overseer of Jerusalem.”19 In a subsequent passage Clement elaborated: “After the resurrection the Lord [Jesus] gave the tradition of knowledge to James the Just and John and Peter, these gave it to the other Apostles, and the other Apostles to the Seventy.”20 This passage preserves for us the