Читаем Maoism in the Developed World полностью

The first major figure in the Progressive Labor leadership to defect was Phillip Abbott Luce. He had helped organize and participated in the parry’s 1963 trip to Cuba, and upon joining the party had quickly become editor of Progressive Labor. When called before the House Unamerican Activities Committee, he defied them, and was subsequently indicted for his role in the Cuban trips. However, early in 1965 he decided to resign from the PLM.

When the PLM announced the “expulsion” of Luce, it blamed his defection on fears of imprisonment. It wrote that “Luce first tried to escape from his fears of imprisonment by smoking marijuana. When this didn’t work, he turned to heroin. This led him to steal money and eventually bare (sic) false witness against his former friends in order to support his habit.”[37]

More serious were the expulsions of 1969-1970. In November 1969, the PLP decided to “reorganize” its leadership. As a consequence, Jared Israel, PLP Boston organizer; Jake Rosen, New York City Organizer; and William Epton, Vice Chairman of the PLP and head of its Harlem branch, were removed from the eight-member National Committee. They were subsequently expelled from the party. Later, Juan and Helena Farinas, editors of Desafio, were expelled also, and Charles Rosen was forced to resign. So was Steve Martinot, one of the leading figures in the Party since its inception. The Farinas’ successor as editor of Desafio, Jay Agostini, submitted his resignation from that post in mid-1970 and was promptly expelled from the Party.

There is no evidence available concerning the points of disagreement that most of these people had with the rest of the PLP leadership. However, it is known that Epton had serious criticisms of the Party’s position on Black Nationalism.[38]

<p><emphasis><strong>PLP Support For China</strong></emphasis></p>

Until 1971, the Progressive Labor Party strongly supported the Chinese in their quarrel with the CPSU and the Soviet regime. A typical expression of this support appeared in “Road to Revolution—II,” a document adopted by the National Committee of the PLP in December 1966. The burden of this 26-page document was an attack on “revisionism” within International Communism. Most sections attacked the Soviet Union, including one subtitled, “The Soviet Revisionists Have Already Restored Capitalism in the Soviet Union,” and another entitled “Soviet ‘Aid’ Is a Trojan Horse Used by Imperialism.”

Another part of the National Committee’s document proclaimed that “Success for China’s Cultural Revolution Is a Defeat for Imperialism.” It said that “The Chinese communists are making a thorough-going effort to transform the thinking and develop the ideology of hundreds of millions of people. Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, led by Mao Tse-tung, the Chinese people are demonstrating that people determine the course of history.”[39]

The document also claimed that “the current struggle against modern revisionism led by the Communist Party of China, has raised Marxist thought to new heights. The thought of Mao Tse-tung is proving invaluable to revolutionaries all over the world. In this debate revisionism is being challenged to a degree that it was never challenged before. A far more fundamental approach is being taken by millions, not just a few. And backing up this titanic struggle is the powerful Chinese Communist Party which gives the revolutionary government a courageous example.”[40]

On various occasions the PLP sent messages of support to the Chinese leadership. Thus, at the time of border conflicts between Chinese and Soviet troops in 1969, the PLP wrote a letter to Mao Tse-tung and Lin Pao [sic] that began, The Progressive Labor Party (PLP) vigorously condemns Soviet aggression against China. U.S.-Soviet collusion is trying to encircle and smash Socialist China.”[41]

A year and a half later, on the occasion of the twenty-first anniversary of the establishment of the People’s Republic of China, the PLP again wrote Mao and Lin Piao (this time spelled correctly). It noted that “The great Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and the Chinese people’s revolution are the two historic milestones in the struggle to smash imperialist exploitation and oppression and to establish a new world of socialism. Marxist-Leninists throughout the world and in the U.S. study the thoughts of the great leaders of these revolutions, V. I. Lenin and Mao Tse-tung, to grasp their revolutionary essence in order to guide and develop further the world revolution.”[42]

<p><emphasis><strong>The PLP Break With The Chinese</strong></emphasis></p>
Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941
100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941

Само имя — БЕРИЯ — до сих пор воспринимается в общественном сознании России как особый символ-синоним жестокого, кровавого монстра, только и способного что на самые злодейские преступления. Все убеждены в том, что это был только кровавый палач и злобный интриган, нанесший колоссальный ущерб СССР. Но так ли это? Насколько обоснованна такая, фактически монопольно господствующая в общественном сознании точка зрения? Как сложился столь негативный образ человека, который всю свою сознательную жизнь посвятил созданию и укреплению СССР, результатами деятельности которого Россия пользуется до сих пор?Ответы на эти и многие другие вопросы, связанные с жизнью и деятельностью Лаврентия Павловича Берии, читатели найдут в состоящем из двух книг новом проекте известного историка Арсена Мартиросяна — «100 мифов о Берии».В первой книге охватывается период жизни и деятельности Л.П. Берии с 1917 по 1941 год, во второй книге «От славы к проклятиям» — с 22 июня 1941 года по 26 июня 1953 года.

Арсен Беникович Мартиросян

Биографии и Мемуары / Политика / Образование и наука / Документальное
10 гениев политики
10 гениев политики

Профессия политика, как и сама политика, существует с незапамятных времен и исчезнет только вместе с человечеством. Потому люди, избравшие ее делом своей жизни и влиявшие на ход истории, неизменно вызывают интерес. Они исповедовали в своей деятельности разные принципы: «отец лжи» и «ходячая коллекция всех пороков» Шарль Талейран и «пример достойной жизни» Бенджамин Франклин; виртуоз политической игры кардинал Ришелье и «величайший англичанин своего времени» Уинстон Черчилль, безжалостный диктатор Мао Цзэдун и духовный пастырь 850 млн католиков папа Иоанн Павел II… Все они были неординарными личностями, вершителями судеб стран и народов, гениями политики, изменившими мир. Читателю этой книги будет интересно узнать не только о том, как эти люди оказались на вершине политического Олимпа, как достигали, казалось бы, недостижимых целей, но и какими они были в детстве, их привычки и особенности характера, ибо, как говорил политический мыслитель Н. Макиавелли: «Человеку разумному надлежит избирать пути, проложенные величайшими людьми, и подражать наидостойнейшим, чтобы если не сравниться с ними в доблести, то хотя бы исполниться ее духом».

Дмитрий Викторович Кукленко , Дмитрий Кукленко

Политика / Образование и наука