Читаем Maoism in the Developed World полностью

Danish Communism suffered severed internal controversies and splits during the decades following World War II. After an upsurge in Communist strength immediately after the war, reflected in their having three ministers in the cabinet and receiving 12.5 percent of the votes in the October 1945 elections, the Communist Party declined sharply in the following decade.

The Danish Communist Party (DKP) remained steadfastly loyal to the Soviet Union in the immediate postwar period. However, in the wake of Nikita Khrushchev’s speech to the CPSU 20th Congress, and the Soviet invasion of Hungary, fierce controversy broke out, with dissidents who were seeking a more independent policy, led by Party Chairman Aksel Larsen, finally being expelled, and in 1958 forming the Socialist People’s Party (SF) in the following year. From its inception, the SF was the largest far-left party in Denmark.

However, within the SF there also soon developed a factional struggle. It culminated in 1967, when the more left-wing members of the party withdrew to form the Socialist Left (VS).[372] It too surpassed the Danish Communist Party in its attractiveness to the voters, and in general influence in Danish politics.[373]

<p><emphasis><strong>Founding And Early Years Of The Communist League (Marxist Leninist)</strong></emphasis></p>

It was dissidents from the Socialist Left who established the Maoist movement in Denmark.[374] The group involved began publishing a periodical, Kommurdsty on June 27, 1968, indicating that it was being published by “a group of revolutionary Communists.’’ Then, on September 15, 1968, they formally established the Communist League (Marxist Leninist), or KF (ML).[375]

The first issue of Kommunist noted that Pravda and the organ of the Danish Communist Party Land og Folk both expressed alarm at the spread of “Maoism.” It added that there was some justification for this alarm, since “Marxist-Leninist” parties had been established in Sweden, Norway, Holland, France, Austria, Italy and England.

In Denmark, Kommunist said, as early as 1963 a “Communist Workers Group” had been formed inside the Danish Communist Party, which fought for a “revolutionary line” and against the KDP’s “international line and reformist politics.”[376]

The KF (ML) was led by Benito Scocozza and Hans Henrik Nielsen, both of whom had belonged to the Left Socialists. However, it was noted in the press at the time that the new group drew its members “from the Left Socialists and from the Danish Communist Party.”[377] Scoccozza was a member of the History Department of the University of Copenhagen.[378]

The Declaration of Principles of the KF (ML), was printed in the third issue of Kommunist, which announced the formation of the new group. The Declaration set forth four points. First, the group was dedicated to founding a “revolutionary Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist).” Second, it was guided by “Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse-tung Thought.” Third, it was organized on the basis of democratic centralism. Fourth, it was in solidarity with all peoples who were fighting imperialism, and with the international proletariat, which was fighting for socialism.[379]

Throughout its eight years of existence, the KF (ML) followed a line that was consistent with Chinese policy. In 1968, it denounced the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia.[380] It opposed Soviet-American efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons, claiming that was an effort to weaken “the antiimperialist camp.”[381] It strongly opposed the United States participation in the war in Vietnam, and charged that the Soviet Union was conspiring with the United States in that conflict.[382] It strongly supported the Chinese Great Cultural Revolution.[383] It strongly supported China in its armed conflict with India, accusing the Indians of “aggression.”[384] It supported President Nixon’s trip to China in 1972, emphasizing the dangers of attack on China by the USSR.[385]

In June 1973, the KF (ML) called for the ending of both NATO and the Warsaw Pact alliances.[386] In 1976 it called for “All Imperialists Out of Angola]”[387]

In 1973-1974, the KF (ML) press paid considerable attention to another group, the Marxist-Leninist Unity League (MLE), which also professed opposition to “revisionism.” There were apparently certain efforts to unite the two organizations, but they came to naught.[388]

Eric S. Einhorn noted in 1979 that the Danish Maoists had “been active in student protest movements and in the most radical factions of the trade union movement.”[389] He also said that they “had strong ‘cells’ in student politics and front organizations (anti-Vietnam war movement).”[390]

Among the labor disputes in which the KF (ML) became at least tangentially involved were those in the Uniprint printing establishment in February 1975 and the B&W metallurgical plant in the same year.[391]

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941
100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941

Само имя — БЕРИЯ — до сих пор воспринимается в общественном сознании России как особый символ-синоним жестокого, кровавого монстра, только и способного что на самые злодейские преступления. Все убеждены в том, что это был только кровавый палач и злобный интриган, нанесший колоссальный ущерб СССР. Но так ли это? Насколько обоснованна такая, фактически монопольно господствующая в общественном сознании точка зрения? Как сложился столь негативный образ человека, который всю свою сознательную жизнь посвятил созданию и укреплению СССР, результатами деятельности которого Россия пользуется до сих пор?Ответы на эти и многие другие вопросы, связанные с жизнью и деятельностью Лаврентия Павловича Берии, читатели найдут в состоящем из двух книг новом проекте известного историка Арсена Мартиросяна — «100 мифов о Берии».В первой книге охватывается период жизни и деятельности Л.П. Берии с 1917 по 1941 год, во второй книге «От славы к проклятиям» — с 22 июня 1941 года по 26 июня 1953 года.

Арсен Беникович Мартиросян

Биографии и Мемуары / Политика / Образование и наука / Документальное
10 гениев политики
10 гениев политики

Профессия политика, как и сама политика, существует с незапамятных времен и исчезнет только вместе с человечеством. Потому люди, избравшие ее делом своей жизни и влиявшие на ход истории, неизменно вызывают интерес. Они исповедовали в своей деятельности разные принципы: «отец лжи» и «ходячая коллекция всех пороков» Шарль Талейран и «пример достойной жизни» Бенджамин Франклин; виртуоз политической игры кардинал Ришелье и «величайший англичанин своего времени» Уинстон Черчилль, безжалостный диктатор Мао Цзэдун и духовный пастырь 850 млн католиков папа Иоанн Павел II… Все они были неординарными личностями, вершителями судеб стран и народов, гениями политики, изменившими мир. Читателю этой книги будет интересно узнать не только о том, как эти люди оказались на вершине политического Олимпа, как достигали, казалось бы, недостижимых целей, но и какими они были в детстве, их привычки и особенности характера, ибо, как говорил политический мыслитель Н. Макиавелли: «Человеку разумному надлежит избирать пути, проложенные величайшими людьми, и подражать наидостойнейшим, чтобы если не сравниться с ними в доблести, то хотя бы исполниться ее духом».

Дмитрий Викторович Кукленко , Дмитрий Кукленко

Политика / Образование и наука