Читаем Maoism in the Developed World полностью

According to the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (the grouping of the supporters of the Maoism of the Great Cultural Revolution and the Gang of Four), it has had supporters in Great Britain. However, the designation of these supporters has changed over time in various publications of the RIM. In one of its earliest pronouncements, a “Joint Communique” of 1980, the British affiliate was listed as the Nottingham Communist Group.[253] In the Declaration of the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement of March 1984, it was said to be the Revolutionary Internationalist Contingent.[254] A listing of “Participating Organizations in RIM” in the December 1996 issue of the RIM magazine, A World to Win, does not include any British organization. However, the headquarters of the RIM continued to be in London.[255] We have no further information concerning the British affiliates of the RIM.

<p><strong>Greek Maoism</strong></p>

The emergence of Maoism in Greece took place against the background of the military dictatorship, often called “the colonels’ regime,” which was set up after a coup in 1967, and which was finally overthrown in July 1974. In that period, at least four different Maoist groups or parties were established in Greece. We have no information as to whether any of these groups was officially recognized by the Chinese Communist Party. As was true in most countries, the Greek Maoists were characterized by considerable internal dissension and splitting. Whatever strength the Greek Maoists had seems to have been principally among students.

During the period of the colonels’ rule, the pro-Soviet Communist Party of Greece (KKE) suffered a serious split. As a consequence of this, there were formed two separate parties, one of which was popularly referred to as the “exterior faction.”[256] Both groups continued their separate existence throughout the colonels’ regime and in the subsequent democratic period. This split served, as one might have expected, to strengthen the Maoist tendency in Greek Communism.

<p><emphasis><strong>The Organization Of Marxist-Leninists Of Greece</strong></emphasis></p>

The oldest of the Maoist organization in Greece was the Organization of Marxist-Leninists of Greece (OMLE), which was established in the mid-1960s. Maurice Goldboom noted in 1968 that “most of its members were never connected with the official Communist movement.”[257] In subsequent years, two of the other groups in Greece originated from splits in the OMLE.

In 1978, D. George Kousoulas noted that the OMLE “often attacks the Soviet ‘social imperialism’ and has sided with Hua Kuo-feng and against the ‘Gang of Four.’”[258] The principal leader of the OMLE was Steois Manousakas, and its periodical was Laiko Dromos.[259] In 1981, D. George Kousoulas noted that the OMLE “broke up into several factions in 1979; the internal feuds continued in 1980.”[260]

<p><emphasis><strong>The Communist Party Of Greece (Marxist-Leninist)</strong></emphasis></p>

Two parties appeared using the name Communist Party of Greece (Marxist-Leninist) or KKEML. The older of these was formed in 1969 by dissidents from the OMLE.[261] It held its First Conference in April 1972. That meeting passed a resolution that said, “We must understand the struggle is between true revolutionary Communists on the one side, the Marxist-Leninists of the entire world under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the Communist Party of Albania, and on the other revisionists and opportunists of every ilk, led by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. … Today’s revisionists are above all the defenders of a new bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie of the social imperialist Soviet Union.”

At the time of its establishment, it was not possible for the KKE (Marxist-Leninist) to publish any open periodicals in Greece because of the military dictatorship. However, its members in exile did publish Laiki Foni (People’s Voice), Anaghenissi (Renaissance or Resurrection), and Espanastatis (Rebel).[262]

A number of members of the KKE (Marxist-Leninist) were arrested by the colonel’s regime and were kept in the Leros prison camp, along with members of the two factions of the Communist Party and other political prisoners. The American Trotskyist publication International Press noted that in prison they were known as the “Resurectionists,” from the name of their periodical. It noted that “the members of this current are bound to the old Stalinist tactics, uninterested in studying and discussing new developments, and faithful to the new Mecca represented by Peking.”[263]

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941
100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941

Само имя — БЕРИЯ — до сих пор воспринимается в общественном сознании России как особый символ-синоним жестокого, кровавого монстра, только и способного что на самые злодейские преступления. Все убеждены в том, что это был только кровавый палач и злобный интриган, нанесший колоссальный ущерб СССР. Но так ли это? Насколько обоснованна такая, фактически монопольно господствующая в общественном сознании точка зрения? Как сложился столь негативный образ человека, который всю свою сознательную жизнь посвятил созданию и укреплению СССР, результатами деятельности которого Россия пользуется до сих пор?Ответы на эти и многие другие вопросы, связанные с жизнью и деятельностью Лаврентия Павловича Берии, читатели найдут в состоящем из двух книг новом проекте известного историка Арсена Мартиросяна — «100 мифов о Берии».В первой книге охватывается период жизни и деятельности Л.П. Берии с 1917 по 1941 год, во второй книге «От славы к проклятиям» — с 22 июня 1941 года по 26 июня 1953 года.

Арсен Беникович Мартиросян

Биографии и Мемуары / Политика / Образование и наука / Документальное
10 гениев политики
10 гениев политики

Профессия политика, как и сама политика, существует с незапамятных времен и исчезнет только вместе с человечеством. Потому люди, избравшие ее делом своей жизни и влиявшие на ход истории, неизменно вызывают интерес. Они исповедовали в своей деятельности разные принципы: «отец лжи» и «ходячая коллекция всех пороков» Шарль Талейран и «пример достойной жизни» Бенджамин Франклин; виртуоз политической игры кардинал Ришелье и «величайший англичанин своего времени» Уинстон Черчилль, безжалостный диктатор Мао Цзэдун и духовный пастырь 850 млн католиков папа Иоанн Павел II… Все они были неординарными личностями, вершителями судеб стран и народов, гениями политики, изменившими мир. Читателю этой книги будет интересно узнать не только о том, как эти люди оказались на вершине политического Олимпа, как достигали, казалось бы, недостижимых целей, но и какими они были в детстве, их привычки и особенности характера, ибо, как говорил политический мыслитель Н. Макиавелли: «Человеку разумному надлежит избирать пути, проложенные величайшими людьми, и подражать наидостойнейшим, чтобы если не сравниться с ними в доблести, то хотя бы исполниться ее духом».

Дмитрий Викторович Кукленко , Дмитрий Кукленко

Политика / Образование и наука