Читаем Maoism in the Developed World полностью

The first national Maoist organization in France was the Federation of Marxist-Leninist Circles in France (Federation des Cercles Marxistes-Leninistes en France), which was established in July 1964. It held its first congress in June 1966, reportedly attended by 150 delegates, the average age of whom was 30 years. That meeting changed the name of the group to the French Communist Movement, Marxist-Leninist (MCF-ML), chose a 25-member central committee, 12 members of a political bureau and a four-person secretariat. These last four were Raymond Casas, Jacques Jurquet, Francois Marty and Marc Tiberat. The Congress also chose Regis Bergeron as editor of L’Humanite Nouvelle, the Movement’s monthly paper, which in October was converted into a weekly.

A manifesto issued by the congress claimed, among other things, that “modern revisionism had ruined the PCF.” Although professing to see some positive aspects in President De Gaulle’s ongoing quarrel with the United States, it said that the French president’s position had not brought anything positive because De Gaulle was still “aligned with the monopolists.”

The first Maoist congress in France declared solidarity with the Chinese party and those of Albania, Indonesia, North Vietnam, and the Communist Party of Belgium, Marxist-Leninist. It characterized Mao Tse-tung as being the “Lenin of our time.” Two months later, a delegation of the Movement visited China and was received by Kang Sheng, a Chinese Politburo member in charge of the party’s international relations. Upon the return of the delegation, the Central Committee of the MCF-ML strongly endorsed the Cultural Revolution, which was just getting under way, declaring it to be a “great leap forward in all spheres” and that it would “consolidate the dictatorship of the proletariat.”[153]

The Peking Review devoted half a page to the French Maoist congress. Among other things, it noted that “While exposing the revisionists of the French Communist Party, the congress pointed out that today the French working class needs a politically conscious and militant vanguard to show it the road. The Congress affirmed the determination to build a ‘new type Party’ as required by the great Lenin, a Party of the Bolshevik type basing its action on the immortal theory of Marxism and Leninism and the thought of Comrade Mao-Tse-tung, the great teacher of world revolution.”[154]

Only a few months after the founding of the PCMLF there took place the student-worker uprising of May 1968, which almost overthrew the regime of President Charles De Gaulle. Like all of the other far Left groups, the PCMLF played some role in these events. Subsequently, Jacques Jurquet maintained that “It is not the Marxist-Leninists who initiated the student revolt. On the other hand, their role in the launching of the strikes with factory occupations was assuredly not negligible.” When barricades were raised on the night of May 10, party members were involved in this and the PCMLF claimed that “Some twenty of our party’s comrades were wounded, two of them seriously.” As a consequence of its participation in the May events, the Parti Comuniste Marxiste Leniniste de France was one of several organizations that were officially outlawed by a June 12, 1968 decree of the De Gaulle government.[155]

Although officially outlawed, this Maoist group continued to function more or less clandestinely. Although its periodical L’Humanite Nouvelle was suppressed, it quickly appeared as the weekly L’Humanite Rouge, and Jacques Jurquet, Ramon Casa and Francois Marty were publicly associated with the new paper.

During the post-1968 period, the PCMLP group was calling for the establishment of a new “revolutionary trade union movement.” It also continued to strongly attack the PCF and its trade union group, the Confederation Generate du Travail (CGT) as well as carrying on polemics with another Maoist group centering on the publication La Cause du Peuple. In December 1969, Jacques Jurquet headed a delegation that visited China.[156]

The PCMLF suffered serious internal dissension during 1970. Its paper commented that “Division—a weapon long wished on us by our enemies—has penetrated everywhere in our ranks, even to the level of our principal spokesmen.” Its “political and financial status” was reported by L’Humanite Rouge to be “very serious,” particularly due to the loss of student readers. The Trotsyite paper Rouge claimed that there were five or six factions within the PCMLF and that some of the party’s members has joined competing Maoist groups. However, the party clearly continued to enjoy the “Chinese franchise” and its publication was cited from time to time by Chinese newspapers and news services.[157]

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941
100 мифов о Берии. Вдохновитель репрессий или талантливый организатор? 1917-1941

Само имя — БЕРИЯ — до сих пор воспринимается в общественном сознании России как особый символ-синоним жестокого, кровавого монстра, только и способного что на самые злодейские преступления. Все убеждены в том, что это был только кровавый палач и злобный интриган, нанесший колоссальный ущерб СССР. Но так ли это? Насколько обоснованна такая, фактически монопольно господствующая в общественном сознании точка зрения? Как сложился столь негативный образ человека, который всю свою сознательную жизнь посвятил созданию и укреплению СССР, результатами деятельности которого Россия пользуется до сих пор?Ответы на эти и многие другие вопросы, связанные с жизнью и деятельностью Лаврентия Павловича Берии, читатели найдут в состоящем из двух книг новом проекте известного историка Арсена Мартиросяна — «100 мифов о Берии».В первой книге охватывается период жизни и деятельности Л.П. Берии с 1917 по 1941 год, во второй книге «От славы к проклятиям» — с 22 июня 1941 года по 26 июня 1953 года.

Арсен Беникович Мартиросян

Биографии и Мемуары / Политика / Образование и наука / Документальное
10 гениев политики
10 гениев политики

Профессия политика, как и сама политика, существует с незапамятных времен и исчезнет только вместе с человечеством. Потому люди, избравшие ее делом своей жизни и влиявшие на ход истории, неизменно вызывают интерес. Они исповедовали в своей деятельности разные принципы: «отец лжи» и «ходячая коллекция всех пороков» Шарль Талейран и «пример достойной жизни» Бенджамин Франклин; виртуоз политической игры кардинал Ришелье и «величайший англичанин своего времени» Уинстон Черчилль, безжалостный диктатор Мао Цзэдун и духовный пастырь 850 млн католиков папа Иоанн Павел II… Все они были неординарными личностями, вершителями судеб стран и народов, гениями политики, изменившими мир. Читателю этой книги будет интересно узнать не только о том, как эти люди оказались на вершине политического Олимпа, как достигали, казалось бы, недостижимых целей, но и какими они были в детстве, их привычки и особенности характера, ибо, как говорил политический мыслитель Н. Макиавелли: «Человеку разумному надлежит избирать пути, проложенные величайшими людьми, и подражать наидостойнейшим, чтобы если не сравниться с ними в доблести, то хотя бы исполниться ее духом».

Дмитрий Викторович Кукленко , Дмитрий Кукленко

Политика / Образование и наука