To this, our usual reply is that doing everything for oneself can be an unbearably limiting factor as well as an exercise in egotism. What if we had to weave all our own clothes, grow our own food, make our own paper and so forth? In actuality we accomplish hardly anything without external instruments, tools or technological aids. Our manifest interdependence attests to nature's determination to force us to overcome isolationist tendencies. Even our two most essential physiological functions, eating and breathing, serve as constant reminders that in every respect we are obliged to use what lies outside of the confines of the bodily organism.
In the end, we do nothing alone and everything by our selves. Let us remember, however, that these myriad intermeshing "selves" are composite facets of the one transcendent Self in all. If we serve one another, if we accept help from outside agencies, that merely shows our faith in the supreme Identity that constitutes the sum and substance of creation.
People have also objected that spiritual development should not be hastened by "unnatural" means. But what really is natural? If it is permissible to harness physical forces such as steam and electricity, why should we not utilize the heretofore untapped powers of mind and soul? Directing the evolutionary energies of human consciousness need not contravene natural law. Indeed, there may be a spiritual mandate that impels
It would indeed be gratifying if nature automatically raised us up the evolutionary escalator. Instead, climbing requires hard work. For the most part, we have to ascend on our own legs, slowly, painstakingly, against a multitude of resistances. At the same time, there is an Intelligence that lends a helping hand. We believe that ketamine can be an instrument of that great redemptive cosmic principle that makes us want to move on. The wholemaking impulse called
We know how much drugs can do to enchance sexual behavior. Why then, shouldn't they be used to enhance our moral and spiritual behavior? Why do we insist on the dichotomy between matter and mind, making it permissible to take vitamins for the body but not for the soul? A hormone that enables a man to make love more effectively is touted in medical journals. But what would be the public reaction to a hormone that simply made him a more loving human being?
It has been amply demonstrated that some psychedelic substances can be therapeutically effective. In cases of alcoholism, depression and terminal disease, LSD has precipitated psychological breakthroughs after all other methods of treatment failed. Rightly and responsibly used, consciousness-altering substances have earned an esteemed place in modern medicine's ever-growing pharmacopoeia. Why then, are the "mind-manifesting" drugs still regarded with so much fear? Can it be because modern science still lingers on the threshold of the unconscious, hesitating to knock too loudly for fear of what might be revealed if the door should open?
The politicians of the nervous system have good reason to mistrust the Pandora's box of psychedelia that was opened up in the 1960s, for the universe thereby revealed bears little resemblance to the reassuringly solid world of objects that can be collected, manipulated and controlled. If the arbiters of the various bureaucratic establishments that keep us in our places were to acknowledge the validity of the psychedelic experience, they would have to rethink the entire foundation of their sciences, religions and their moral and ethical systems. People whose most intimate personal experiences have convinced them that everything is interrelated are hardly likely to support the armaments race or to wax enthusiastic over the production of bigger and better neutron bombs.