"The thoroughness, for one. Disfigurement is often localized — the face will be scarred, or the genitals or breasts will be carved up. This process seemed to concentrate on no one part of the anatomy — or, more precisely, it seemed to involve
"Would it be fair to say that whoever performed the procedures on this body had expert medical knowledge?"
"Yes and no."
" ‘Yes and no,’ " repeated Ziegler. "What do you mean by that?"
"Yes, he or she clearly knew how to use surgical instruments. For instance, Ms. Ziegler, if I were to hand you or anyone else who had never used one before a scalpel and asked you to carve into a body, you’d likely make a tentative trial cut first — this would show as a hesitation mark, or shallow wound. Whoever dissected Dr. Calhoun showed no such inexperience. I would judge that the person doing it was quite familiar with dissecting technique."
"Then your answer is yes — the person
"Expert knowledge of
At the defense table, Dale sighed. Ziegler had doubtless coached Flemingdon to volunteer this idea, neatly preventing Dale from objecting to a question that invited speculation from the witness.
"No specific knowledge of human anatomy?" repeated Ziegler.
"Yes."
"Can you give further examples that support this conclusion?"
"Well, whoever did the cutting opened the stomach up before removing it from the chest cavity — resulting in gastric acid spilling into the torso. If you’d known in advance that the stomach contained acid, you’d have removed it as a unit and dissected it separately."
"Thank you. Did you conduct an inventory of body parts?"
"Yes."
"Why did you do that?"
"In murder cases involving disfigurement or dismembering, it’s not unusual for the killer to keep a souvenir of the crime."
"A souvenir?"
"Yes — a finger, perhaps, or, in some sex-related crimes, part of the genitals."
"So you inventoried Dr. Calhoun’s body parts. What did you find?"
"Several pieces were missing."
"Which parts specifically, Doctor?"
"The right eye was gone."
Intake of breath from jurors four and six; Dale had identified both of them as queasy during
"The eye was removed?" repeated Ziegler, as if surprised by this piece of news.
"Yes."
"By the same cutting tool?"
"Well, sort of. The eyeball was prized from the socket, possibly by fingers, but the muscles and optic nerve were indeed severed cleanly, quite probably by the same tool, yes."
"Was anything else missing?"
"The vermiform process."
" ‘The vermiform process,’ " repeated Ziegler. She looked at the jury. "Is there another name by which we might be more familiar with that, Doctor?"
"It’s commonly called the appendix."
"The same appendix that’s down here?" She touched her lower right side.
"The one that’s prone to appendicitis?"
"That’s right."
"How was it removed?"
"Well, not the normal way — that is, not like we do it in an appendectomy, going in from outside. Rather it was clipped out during the internal dissection."
"Are you sure about this?" said Ziegler. "Couldn’t his appendix have been removed years before? Lots of people have no appendix — I don’t myself."
"There was no appendectomy scar on Calhoun’s body, and no signs of an old operation internally. Still, I did check with Calhoun’s personal physician and his health-insurance company. The doctor had no record of Calhoun ever having appendicitis, and the insurer has no claim on file for an appendectomy operation."
"Was anything else missing?"
"Yes. Dr. Calhoun’s lower jaw and neck were gone."
More mock surprise. "His neck?"
"Yes, that’s right. I said the head was severed from the body. In fact, the highest vertebra intact in the torso was the first thoracic one. And the head had no vertebrae left attached to it. All seven cervical vertebrae were gone, along with the throat and the Adam’s apple. Also missing was the mandible — the lower jaw."
"Do you have any idea why the perpetrator would take these particular body parts, Doctor?"
"No."
"Are you sure that it wasn’t the removal of these body parts that caused Dr. Calhoun’s death?"
"I’m sure. He was dead by the time they were removed."
"How do you know that?"