Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

Figure 5.3 A map of areas in Nazi eastern Europe cultivated with kok-sagyz. Dotted half-circles denote areas of cultivation abandoned after to the Soviet counter-attack; black half-circles indicate new areas under cultivation in 1944.(Jahresbericht der Gruppe Anbau und Versuchswesen für die Zeit vom 1. Januar 1943 bis 31. Dezember 1943, Bundesarchiv, NS19/3919)

The first large scale planning for Auschwitz in Himmler’s grand scheme of the settlement of the east was to convert the area into a large experimental estate providing German settlers with training and “house nurseries, for the production of seed corn, garden seeds, berries, fruits,… and livestock (horses, pigs, cattle, hens).”[73] Rudolf Höss, the Auschwitz commandant appointed in May 1940, couldn’t be more enthusiastic about the prospectus of fully transforming his modest camp, destined until then to be no more than a regional prison for recalcitrant Poles waiting to be sent west as slave laborers. This was also his opportunity to finally fulfill his dream of having his own manor. Here is how Höss described his visit to the Reichsführer SS in November 1940: “Himmler became very lively and began planning, issuing one directive after another, and made notes about all the things that needed to be done in the estates around Auschwitz…. Certainly there were enough workers available. Every necessary agricultural experiment was to be tried there. Huge laboratories and plant cultivation departments had to be built…. The marshlands were to be drained and developed…. He continued with his agricultural planning even down to the smallest detail.”[74] The projected 10,000 inmates of the camp were to serve first and foremost the works of establishing this gigantic agricultural experiment station.

Himmler’s pastoral dreams for Auschwitz would radically change when IG Farben expressed interest for building in the area a gigantic chemical plant for the manufacture of synthetic fuel and rubber (buna).[75] The town of Auschwitz would still be a model settlement, but now inhabited by German engineers, clerks, and specialized workers recruited to a factory built on the comparative advantages of the place: a railway intersection, with abundant water sources, and offering a cheap labor force provided by the mass of prisoners managed by Himmler’s SS. In subsequent years a continuous stream of non-Jewish and Jewish laborers would be sent to Auschwitz to work in the chemical factory under horrible conditions—the death toll was of about 35,000 workers—although the large majority of the Jews that arrived from 1942 on went directly to the gas chambers. By then, most of the killing by the Nazis of Soviet and Polish Jews had already occurred (through shooting or gassing on site across occupied eastern Europe), and Auschwitz would mainly receive Jews from France, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Greece, and Hungary, deported not as labor force but to be exterminated. Auschwitz had thus the double nature of labor and death camp, setting it apart from most other camps that were either dedicated to one or the other. Its total death figures are around 1.1 million, including about a million Jews.[76]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное