Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

According to the numbers published by agricultural statisticians, swine were evolving in the desired direction.[109] In the years 1934–1936 there were more swine than in 1930–1932, but the number of breeding animals had declined by 140,000. The number of piglets also had declined, to fewer than 1.6 million. Swine were living longer, and their total weight had increased from 2.85 million tons to 3.05 million. While breeding pigs were now living 2¼ years, fattening pigs were slaughtered at the age of 8–9 months. Crucially, fattening performance had improved, for swine consumed less grain (14 percent) at the same time they increased their pork and fat output. For the same period, the total fat output from swine had increased by 101,000 tons.

The changing geography of pig production also reflected the changing nature of pigs during the Nazi years. Northwest Germany’s location near an easy import market had made it one of the highest-producing regions of the country before the Nazi takeover. The regions around Bremen or Hamburg had easy access to imported grains and protein fodders, and made use of rations very different from the ones as proposed by Frölich, rising their animals almost exclusively on grains and fish and meat meals. As the Nazi regime increased restrictions on imports, particularly after the launching of the Four-Year Plan, pig production tended to increase in the eastern regions of the Reich (the regions with higher potato production) at the expense of the northwest.[110] Pigs raised in the east were more easily rooted in the soil than those of the northwest.

In 1937, three professors from the University of Halle—Gustav Frölich, Theodor Römer, and Emil Woermann—presented to the Kaiser Wilhelm Society a project for a new institute dedicated first and foremost to the nutrition of animals, including all major domesticated animals.[111] This was to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Animal Breeding, which was to be inaugurated in 1939. To confirm the importance of the subject for the Nazi economy, suffice it to say that by 1944 this institute had the second-largest budget of all institutes of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society, second only to the plant-breeding institute.

Following the research lines already mentioned above, the new institute was to work with animal performance tests, exploring the inheritance of performance characteristics. The results of this research were then to be distributed among the extended animal-breeding network of the RNS, guaranteeing “the highest performing stocks were selected in the most important German breeds for all types of livestock.” Agriculture State Secretary Herbert Backe, the first patron of the institute among the Nazi ruling elite, bluntly asserted that “all animals that make inefficient use of feed must be eliminated.”[112] In other words, all those animals not complying with the standard of rootedness in the soil established by academic animal breeders were to be slaughtered.

Other historians have already described in detail the forming and functioning of this institution.[113] Here I just want to make a brief commentary related to the buildings and location of the flamboyant new institute. The Kaiser Wilhelm Society had at its disposal a vast holding of about 800 hectares in Dummerstorf, near Rostock in the province of Mecklenburg. Those familiar with the works of Günter Grass can easily imagine of a landscape where the most distinctive feature are endless potato fields. The architects of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society adapted a previous farm as a scientific institution, preserving the original central building, from which radiated the many different departments with their laboratories of morphology, physiology, biological chemistry, genetics, and veterinary medicine. The institute was planned as a central research institution for the whole of German breeding and would become the largest such facility in all of Europe, with residential buildings, a school, a swimming pool, a community building with social facilities, farm buildings, and, of course, many stables. Green areas surrounded all the facilities. Every residential house had a private garden. Streets and squares were lined by dense rows of trees. It was a model community rooted in Mecklenburg’s soil. The architects spoke of it as harmoniously integrated in the region, as bodenständig, with no “alien elements disturbing the landscape of Mecklenburg.”[114]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное