Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

The tight connections between scientists’ concerns and the Nazi food policies expressed in Richard Darré’s diatribes are not difficult to trace. The fattening performance tests developed at academic institutes offered standards with which to evaluate animals’ potential contribution to the building of the Nazi regime. In Darré’s words, “we need animals achieving the highest performance when fed exclusively with homeland feedstuff.”[52] Hogs bred according to the results of performance tests would guarantee the nation’s nutritional independence, materializing the “Blut und Boden” dictum.

Figure 4.5 The animal bureaucracy of the Reichsnährstand.(Albert Brummenbaum, “Die Organisation der deutschen Tierzucht,” Kühn-Archiv 49, 1938: 3–7)

But performance tests could have such large effects only if connected with an extended bureaucracy reaching the entire territory. In December of 1933, soon after the seizure of power by the Nazis, the Reichsnährstand took over the entire organization of German animal breeding, integrating in its structure the breeding societies scattered through the country.[53] All the local societies were now part of RNS-controlled associations of breeders of cattle, pigs, sheep, and small animals.

A few months before the takeover by the RNS, the Zeitschrift für Schweinezucht (Journal of Pig Breeding) was already welcoming the new regime. In its account of the May 1933 exhibition of the Deutsche Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft in Berlin, the journal not only reminded readers that two thirds of Germany’s meat intake was pork; it also emphasized the importance of bringing practical breeders and scientists together to increase the performance of the nation’s swine herd.[54] A picture of Gustav Frölich exchanging thoughts with a pig herder at the exhibition demonstrated explicitly the union of mind and hand. The reporter couldn’t contain his enthusiasm for the task awaiting German pig breeders in the years to come:

During [World War I] there was a denomination for people who didn’t earn the iron cross or other medals but who nevertheless demonstrated notable courage, purposeful energy, brotherly love, and sincere comradeship. They were called the front pigs (Frontschweine)…. Let us borrow this term into our field of action so that we may say that in the gigantic battle that has now started… for a vital Germany inhabited by loyal people, the German pig breeders will gladly be the front pigs![55]

To induce German pig breeders to become “front pigs” mobilized for the building of a national community, the RNS devised a new institutional arrangement in addition to the breeders’ societies. Each of the nineteen Landbauernschaften in the provincial structure of the RNS was provided with an office for animal breeding, an office for animal health, and a registry office (Köramt). The latter was responsible for publishing an annual list of the stallions, bulls, boars, and rams recorded in the provincial registers. This task was performed locally by register posts (Körstellen) operating in the 541 Landkreise (counties) and directly controlling the farmers’ management of their herds.[56] The stakes were high, since the holding of domesticated animals accounted for about 60 percent of the value of Germany’s agricultural output.[57]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное