Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

But if Köhler’s work was aimed at changing the RNS recommendations for prevention of virus diseases,[115] his intensive use of test plants was too slow and costly to be used effectively on a large scale by commercial breeders and seed multipliers.[116] In 1936, the BRA’s director, while pleading for more funds for his institution from Minister of Food and Agriculture Richard W. Darré, acknowledged that it had not yet been possible to produce a quick standard procedure for RNS officials to evaluate commercial potato breeders and certify businesses that their seeds were free of virus infection.[117] In that same year, the Nazis’ Four-Year Plan was launched, putting more pressure on potato production to get Germany ready for waging war in four years. It was for that reason that Carl Stapp, also at the BRA, began to explore faster serological methods. Centrifuged sap from the tuber to be tested was dropped on thin wafers impregnated with virus antiserum produced by immunized rabbits. After 20 minutes of incubation it was possible to examine the probe under a microscope and determine the presence or absence of viruses. In 1943 Stapp claimed to have tested several thousand seeds from different commercial breeding houses and suggested the extended use of centrifuges, incubators, and microscopes to deploy the BRA method to the German fields. After a few weeks of training, every technician would allegedly be qualified to perform the serological procedure, which according to Stapp was to play a crucial role in guaranteeing Germany’s food security. We don’t have data about the spread of the method in the war years, but Stapp himself cited its use by breeding farms in the Lüneburger Heide (Lüneburg Heath).[118]

<p>Experimental Systems and the Expansion of the Nazi Regime</p>

It is important to retain from this story that each new experimental system developed by the BRA at its sprawling Dahlem facilities not only sustained a growing community of scientists tinkering with potato varieties, pathogens, and testing procedures; it also enhanced the presence of Darré’s Reichsnährstand in the German countryside. It was no small thing that BRA scientists offered the RNS a quick method for detecting viruses’ presence in a field. The capacity of the RNS to intervene in German agriculture grew with each new experimental system developed by the BRA. Research on wart allowed for cleansing the chaotic potato seed market, establishing a biological basis to differentiate between varieties; the Colorado Beetle mobilized Germans by the hundreds of thousands, children and women included, to defend the national soil from foreign intruders; viruses extended the RNS’s control over commercial breeders fields. In all these cases the experimental work had to do mainly with developing quick methods of inoculating a large number of potato specimens and identifying resistant varieties.

What might have been perceived as an innocent scientific activity similar to what phytopathologists were doing in other parts of the world was actually an important part of the expansion of the Nazi regime through the action of the RNS. To tinker with combinations of potatoes, pathogens, and inoculation tests, to tinker with experimental systems, led to new epistemic things such as Muller’s phytoalexin. But it also led to inclusion in the Reichssortenlist of varieties resistant to late blight, promising to overcome the food-shortage traumas of World War I and to make Germany ready for another war as was demanded by the Four-Year Plan. The RNS based its control of the seed circuit on the tests developed at the BRA. In the opposite direction, the BRA used the RNS’s regional structure to guarantee that its standards would reach the entire country.

There is more to this relationship than simply that the regime drew resources from science and vice versa.[119] It probably is better to speak of co-production of science and the state than to speak of resources as if science and politics were two different spheres.[120] The intimate relationship between the RNS and the BRA, with departments of the first present in the facilities of the second, points at tighter entanglements. As has been demonstrated, experimental systems at the BRA measured their success both by their capacity to generate new scientific things and by their contributions to the expansion of the Nazi regime.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное