Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

It should be apparent that the main question about science and fascism is not whether scientists were themselves fascist or not. On the one hand, we have a traditional arrangement for state sponsorship of science, with the agencies of the fascist regime supporting scientific research, funding the creation of the National Agricultural Experiment Station (EAN), and supporting some of the EAN’s departments through corporatist agencies. Nothing very surprising there. But, more interestingly, we have scientists and their technoscientific organisms—high-yielding seeds—participating directly in the building of a corporatist state that removed all mechanisms of liberal representation and replaced them with an allegedly organic structure based on “economic solidarities.” The first and one of the main organs of this structure in Portugal, the National Federation of Wheat Producers (FNPT), bought farmers’ production and distributed seeds developed by the breeding department of the EAN. The new strains of wheat weaved together large landowners of the Alentejo region, sharecroppers enlarging the cultivated areas of the large estates, underpaid and oppressed wage laborers cultivating the richer deeper soils of the properties, large chemical factories in the capital city, bread self-sufficiency, and the corporatist tripartite structure of the FNPT, the Farmers’ Guilds, and the Casas do Povo. Here was the fascists’ alternative modernist vision: an organic nation feeding and growing itself by making, distributing, cultivating, and consuming breeders’ technoscientific organisms.

Figure 2.6 A bas-relief by Henri Bettencourt of the Portuguese Corporatist New State, carved for Portugal’s pavilion at the Paris World Exhibition, 1937.(Fundo Mário Novais, Art Library of the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation)<p>Modernism, Genetics, and the New State</p>

In Portugal, as in Italy, there was no contradiction between ruralization and modernization. Whereas Pequito Rebelo had a passion for both aviation and agriculture, and thus could effortless reproduce Mussolini’s futuristic combination of wheat thresher and intrepid aviator, no one would have imagined Salazar wearing goggles. Salazar’s character seems to support the traditionalist interpretation of his regime as a conservative dictatorship, as evidenced by his suspicion of urban life and his praise of modest pastoral virtues. But Salazar himself suggested alternative interpretations.[79] In his 1938 summary of the accomplishments of the regime, he contrasted the “economic and social revolution” that had taken place in Portugal (a “revolution on the march”) with simple “financial reform.”[80] In 1966, the old dictator could still boost that “in our century, we are the only corporatist revolution that triumphs.”[81] Here I want to insist that to perceive the modernist nature of the Portuguese fascist New State one can’t shy away from agriculture. It was through agriculture that the new alternative modernity of Salazar’s fascist corporatist state came into being.

In 1936 new legislation had reorganized the Ministry of Agriculture, recognizing explicitly the role of scientific research in ruralizing the country.[82] The law founded both the Board for Internal Colonization, which was created to plan the settlement of southern Portugal with people from overpopulated areas of the country, and the National Agricultural Experiment Station (EAN), the scientific arm of the ministry.[83] A year later, Câmara, then only 36 years old, was nominated director of the new EAN. Not only was Câmara a distinguished participant in the Wheat Campaign, and of all other production battles that followed; he also had experience in renowned international research institutions. Like many other promising young Portuguese scientists, he had been granted a scholarship by the Board of National Education that had been founded in 1929 by the government to fund the training of the new technical elite by supporting new research groups and by financing stays in internationally respected centers.[84] Câmara spent 1932–33 at Cambridge and Edinburgh and 1936 at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institut für Biologie in Berlin.[85] It was after his years in Scotland and England that he started his research in cytogenetics, but it was his Berlin experience that offered him the connections between genetics research and the political economy of fascism and that directly inspired the design of the EAN. It is not incidental that after the strong presence of Italian fascism in Portuguese fields in the early 1930s Nazism had become the main reference point for New State elites.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное