Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

In 1914 Strampelli presented his first big success: the Carlotta Strampelli strain (named after his wife, who, as has already been noted, participated actively in the hybridization work).[40] The Carlotta strain resulted from hybridization between the Rieti and Massy varieties and successfully combined the low susceptibility to rust of Rieti with the resistance to lodging of Massy, achieving high productivity in the fertile deep soils of central and northern Italy.[41] With help from local chairs of agriculture, seeds were distributed to 318 farmers, 297 of whom gave positive feedback to Strampelli and only 17 of whom complained about poor results.[42] The yield of the Carlotta strain in the first years was enough to transform its creator into a public figure. But after the rainy winters of 1914–1917 came dry years that revealed the fragility of the new “elite race” under drought conditions. The news of record productivities had convinced farmers in other regions, including arid areas of southern Italy, to make use of Carlotta seeds—an error that led to suspicion of the value of the new strain. In the following years, Strampelli was to become more cautious about the way his new creations were released, and was to exercise control over the circulation cycle.

The Ardito hybrid was to assume the burden of saving Strampelli’s reputation. To produce that strain, the geneticist employed exotic varieties from the collection of wheats from around the world that he had been accumulating in his institution. According to Sergio Salvi’s reconstruction of the process, Strampelli corresponded with the main centers of wheat breeding in the world (among them Wageningen, St. Petersburg, and the Vilmorin company).[43] This was a central feature of any ambitious hybridization program: to have at its disposal a large variety of plants from different origins, ready to be combined in the most productive way.[44] Instead of operating as the old Botanic Gardens did, acclimatizing entire trees and plants, the geneticist at the Rieti Experiment Station combined organisms that, taken in isolation, presented no obvious benefit. No other case is more convincing than the development of Ardito, which resulted from hybridization of the already highly productive hybrid of Rieti and Wilhelmina Tarve with the Japanese strain Akagomuchi. The Japanese variety had no value when standing alone in a field, but its precocity was a precious resource to incorporate into Ardito, which would mature fifteen to twenty days earlier than common varieties. Not only could the terrain be used for a second crop; equally important, advancing the harvest season minimized the effects of drought. Also, earlier harvests meant less exposure of peasants to malaria, a crucial issue for the unreclaimed lands of southern Italy.

And this was not all. Crucially, the Akagomuchi strain, with its small and thick stems, also conferred on Ardito great resistance to lodging, allowing generous use of chemical fertilizers. Ardito would thus become the best friend of the big chemical conglomerate formed by fascist developmentist economic policy. Strampelli talked of productivities that might reach 64 quintals per hectare (94 bushels per acre), more than ten times those achieved with common varieties. This combination of dwarf Japanese wheats with fertilizers immediately evokes the Norman Borlaug varieties that revolutionized grain production in India and Mexico in the 1960s, thus confirming Jonathan Harwood’s suggestion that we should talk of a first Green Revolution in the early decades of the twentieth century.[45]

Figure 1.6 Strampelli’s Ardito wheat, 1932.(Strampelli, “I Miei Lavori”)

Strampelli released his new variety in 1920. But only with the launching of the fascist “Battle of Wheat” were the new elite races to find massive diffusion in Italy. In 1925, three years into fascist rule, Strampelli’s wheats occupied no more than 3 percent of the cultivated grain area of Italy. That would climb to 30 percent in 1932 and would exceed 50 percent in 1940.[46] In the fertile areas of the Po Valley in northern Italy, Strampelli’s hybrids monopolized the entire market. In the highly productive province of Ferrara, about 90 percent of the total grain acreage was planted with Strampelli’s seeds.[47] Not only did grain production skyrocket with the massive use of fertilizers, more than doubling wheat productivity in Ferrara, but the early character of grains such as Ardito offered the possibility of freeing the land for production of rice, tobacco, or linen, further contributing to the autarky policies of the fascist regime.[48]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное