Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

The results achieved at the Giggiga experimental farm with crossing, artificial insemination, feeding diets, and pasture rotations were to demonstrate the viability of such an enterprise for white settlers in the whole territory. Settlers maintained close relations with experiment stations in order to guarantee the success of their own farms. To respect and follow the mating decisions made by the technical experts was a pre-condition for owning a Karakul farm. The experimental station would supply a pureblood Karakul ram or its sperm, and the settler had to keep good records of all the progeny, using forms supplied by agricultural officials.[120] Each farm was assigned a series of numbers to mark its animals resulting from crossings, using the right ear for the register number and the left one for its degree of purity—for example, a mark of 1/2 would mean half-blood Karakul. Male descendants were to be slaughtered after the first three days, or castrated if kept for meat production. Females could be kept for further crossings, their number limited by the carrying capacity of pastureland, a number also defined by the agriculture technicians. The owner had to record each animal’s date of birth, genealogy, grade of purity, register number, general physical features (tail and neck), and quality of fur, following the University of Halle’s standards based on the nature of curly hair (form, density, brightness, etc.). It didn’t prove easy to find Italian settlers able to conform to such demands. Needless to say, there was no possibility that indigenous people would own Karakul farms.

As the dimensions of the Giggiga undertaking suggested, the experimental Karakul farm was conceived both as a scientific site and as a demonstration exercise. Besides acquisition of land and animals, the farm also had to deal with labor relations. German South West Africa was invoked explicitly in the Giggiga project as having developed an exemplary virtuous indigenous labor regime responsible for freeing natives from their indolence and leading them to discover the virtues of wage labor.[121] The experimental farm should thus be seen as an outpost of colonization experimenting with every dimension of colonial life: taking pasturelands by force, acquiring local animals at low price, crossing them with pureblood Karakul following the rules and recording practices established by the experimental station, and dealing with indigenous populations as a pool of cheap labor for white settlers’ commercial farming operations.

Much of the construction work was to employ military resources. Military personnel were to help with the building of stables, and military vehicles were to be used for all transportation needs. More tellingly, Karakul farms demanded great quantities of barbed wire, which was readily available in Ethiopia as a result of the military occupation. If originally the military had adapted barbed wire to war aims from cattle ranching, the experiment station was now to take the opposite direction and use it to demarcate land establishing colonial settlement.[122]

<p>Circulating Karakul III: South West Africa and Angola</p>

World War II would abruptly end Italy’s imperial dreams, and on May 5, 1941—less than a year and a half after the approval of the Giggiga project—Emperor Haile Selassie reentered Addis Ababa. Grande Italia soon disappeared from the map, and the Karakul farm with it. But while Italians were losing their empire, Salazar’s regime in Portugal, profiting from its neutrality in World War II, was engaging in southwest Angola, in the Namib Desert, in a late war of pacification.[123]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное