Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

In April of 1931—or, according to the official calendar of Mussolini’s regime, year IX of the Fascist era—Francesco Maiocco, the head of the National Institute of Rabbit Breeding (Istituto Nazionale de Coniglicoltura) in Alessandria, presented to the Ministry of Agriculture a detailed account of Italy’s production of rabbit pelts.[81] In the previous years the institute had been developing standards of body weight and pelt quality to put rabbit producers and pelt merchants in accordance with one another. Maiocco made his best effort to offer dignity to the modest object of research of his institution, reminding the Minister of Agriculture that the city of Milan alone consumed at least 25,000 rabbits every week and that Florence needed a supply of about a million rabbits per year. In a country engaged in a battle for self-sufficiency that would only become harsher in subsequent years, rabbits, according to Maiocco, could become an important resource, supplying the flourishing national fashion market and at the same time reducing the importing of meat. Such reasoning was well attuned to Mussolini’s vision of Italy as an autarkic economy.[82]

Figure 6.9 A German settler and a Karakul ram in South West Africa.(Steinhof, Deutsche Heimat in Afrika)

By the end of the 1930s, the Istituto Nazionale de Coniglicoltura had established formal relations with about 6,000 rabbit growers, forming numerous local breeding rings whose statutes Maiocco also designed.[83] Maiocco worked closely with the Fascist organization Dopolavoro. Mobilizing what he called the “breeders and friends of rabbits” was not easy, for it was a highly dispersed group of small growers located mainly in the suburbs of major Italian cities, feeding the animals produce from their home vegetable gardens. Only through the mass organizations of the regime run by women was it possible to imagine reaching this diffuse population and standardizing breeding practices.[84]

Eight years later, in 1939, Maiocco welcomed the Ministry of Agriculture to Alessandria once more. This time he was joined by Mussolini.[85] Maiocco boasted again of the great work of his institute in contributing to the yearly Italian production of 50 million rabbits, for which he received the praise of the Duce, along with 400,000 extra lira for his research work. In exchange for the donation, Mussolini demanded that production be doubled to 100 million rabbits in order to contribute to the national autarky effort, which had been greatly intensified since the Ethiopian campaign of 1935–36. Maiocco apparently made promises concerning a new fur animal developed by the institute: Karakul sheep. The pledge now was that mass production of Karakul would cover the needs of the Milan fashion industry, which consumed approximately 200,000–300,000 Persian furs from central Asia and South West Africa, purchased in the two big world markets of London and Leipzig, thus saving Italy an appreciable amount of foreign currency. Maiocco offered Mussolini a Karakul lamb from his institute’s herd.[86] The Istituto Nazionale de Coniglicoltura, following the example of Halle, was fashioning itself as a center of Karakul circulation, supplying pureblood rams and ewes to the brave Italian settlers in the Italian colonies of North Africa (Libya) and East Africa (Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Somalia).

But before we explore the circuit from Italy to Africa, we have to understand how Maiocco was able to form his pureblood Karakul flock in Alessandria. His interest in Karakul had first been raised by a visit at the end of 1930 to a pelt fair in Leipzig, where he saw Persian furs exhibited by Thorer’s company. More important, in March of the next year, the Halle Animal Breeding Institute brought to the twelfth Milan Pelt Fair a small group of Karakul sheep, a picture of which was featured on the front page of the April issue of Coniglicoltura (Rabbit Breeding), a journal edited by the Istituto Nazionale de Coniglicoltura.[87] Although a few private farmers in Italy had already imported Karakul rams from several European countries, the non-systematic nature of these efforts drove Maiocco to try to emulate the Halle example and seize the opportunity to launch Karakul production in Italy on a large scale through standards and methods established by his own institute. More than just offering a traditional extension service to farmers, he designed a research program concerning acclimation and the crossing of Karakul rams with local breeds. Following the German model, he also established a register to be managed by the Ministry of Agriculture or, alternatively, by the Istituto Nazionale de Coniglicoltura.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

100 великих интриг
100 великих интриг

Нередко политические интриги становятся главными двигателями истории. Заговоры, покушения, провокации, аресты, казни, бунты и военные перевороты – все эти события могут составлять только часть одной, хитро спланированной, интриги, начинавшейся с короткой записки, вовремя произнесенной фразы или многозначительного молчания во время важной беседы царствующих особ и закончившейся грандиозным сломом целой эпохи.Суд над Сократом, заговор Катилины, Цезарь и Клеопатра, интриги Мессалины, мрачная слава Старца Горы, заговор Пацци, Варфоломеевская ночь, убийство Валленштейна, таинственная смерть Людвига Баварского, загадки Нюрнбергского процесса… Об этом и многом другом рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Виктор Николаевич Еремин

Биографии и Мемуары / История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии
1917 год. Распад
1917 год. Распад

Фундаментальный труд российского историка О. Р. Айрапетова об участии Российской империи в Первой мировой войне является попыткой объединить анализ внешней, военной, внутренней и экономической политики Российской империи в 1914–1917 годов (до Февральской революции 1917 г.) с учетом предвоенного периода, особенности которого предопределили развитие и формы внешне– и внутриполитических конфликтов в погибшей в 1917 году стране.В четвертом, заключительном томе "1917. Распад" повествуется о взаимосвязи военных и революционных событий в России начала XX века, анализируются результаты свержения монархии и прихода к власти большевиков, повлиявшие на исход и последствия войны.

Олег Рудольфович Айрапетов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное